Publications

Wilson, David G.; Bacelli, Giorgio B.; Coe, Ryan G.; Robinett, R.D.R.; Thomas, Gareth T.; Linehan, Daniel L.; Newborn, David N.; Quintero, Miguel Q.

Abstract not provided.

Bacelli, Giorgio B.; Patterson, David; Bull, Diana L.; Coe, Ryan G.

Abstract not provided.

Patterson, David; Bull, Diana L.; Bacelli, Giorgio B.; Coe, Ryan G.

Abstract not provided.

Coe, Ryan G.; lawson, michael j.; Yi-Hsiang, Yu Y.; Rij, Jennifer V.

Abstract not provided.

Coe, Ryan G.; Michelen Strofer, Carlos A.; lawson, michael j.; Yu, Yi-Hsiang Y.

Abstract not provided.

2014 Oceans - St. John's, OCEANS 2014

Coe, Ryan G.; Bull, Diana L.

A nonlinear three-dimensional time-domain performance model has been developed for a floating axisymmetric point absorbing WEC. This model employs a set of linear partial differential equations, in the form of a state-space model, to replace the convolution integrals needed to solve for radiation reaction. Linear time-domain results are verified against predictions from a frequency-domain model. Nonlinear timedomain predictions are compared back to frequency-domain and linear time-domain predictions to show the effects of some linearization assumptions. A simple resistive control strategy is applied throughout these scenarios.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE

Coe, Ryan G.; Bull, Diana L.

A three dimensional time-domain model, based on Cummins equation, has been developed for an axisymmetric point absorbing wave energy converter (WEC) with an irregular cross section. This model incorporates a number of nonlinearities to accurately account for the dynamics of the device: hydrostatic restoring, motion constraints, saturation of the powertake-off force, and kinematic nonlinearities. Here, an interpolation model of the hydrostatic restoring reaction is developed and compared with a surface integral based method. The effects of these nonlinear hydrostatic models on device dynamics are explored by comparing predictions against those of a linear model. For the studied WEC, the interpolation model offers a large improvement over a linear model and is roughly two orders-of-magnitude less computationally expensive than the surface integral based method.

Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference

Bull, Diana L.; Coe, Ryan G.; Monda, Mark; Dullea, Kevin; Bacelli, Giorgio B.; Patterson, David

A new multi-year effort has been launched by the Department of Energy to validate the extent to which control strategies can increase the power produced by resonant wave energy conversion (WEC) devices. This paper describes the design of a WEC device to be employed by this program in the development and assessment of WEC control strategies. The operational principle of the device was selected to provide a test-bed for control strategies, in which a specific control strategies effectiveness and the parameters on which its effectiveness depends can be empirically determined. Numerical design studies were employed to determine the device geometry, so as to maximize testing opportunities in the Maneuvering and Seakeeping (MASK) Basin at the Naval Surface Warfare Centers David Taylor Model Basin. Details on the physical model including specific components and model fabrication methodologies are presented. Finally the quantities to be measured and the mechanisms of measurement are listed.

Bull, Diana L.; Coe, Ryan G.

Abstract not provided.

Coe, Ryan G.; Neary, Vincent S.; Lawon, Michael J.; Yu, Yi-Hsiang Y.; Weber, Jochem W.

Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) hosted the Wave Energy Converter (WEC) Extreme Conditions Modeling (ECM) Workshop in Albuquerque, New Mexico on May 13–14, 2014. The objective of the workshop was to review the current state of knowledge on how to numerically and experimentally model WECs in extreme conditions (e.g. large ocean storms) and to suggest how national laboratory resources could be used to improve ECM methods for the benefit of the wave energy industry. More than 30 U.S. and European WEC experts from industry, academia, and national research institutes attended the workshop, which consisted of presentations from W EC developers, invited keynote presentations from subject matter experts, breakout sessions, and a final plenary session .

Ruehl, Kelley M.; Dallman, Ann R.; Karlson, Benjamin K.; Paquette, Joshua P.; Griffith, Daniel G.; Coe, Ryan G.; Resor, Brian R.; LeBlanc, Bruce P.; Roberts, Jesse D.; Hill, Roger; Bull, Diana L.; Gunawan, Budi G.; Chartrand, Chris C.

Abstract not provided.

Michelen Strofer, Carlos A.; Neary, Vincent S.; Coe, Ryan G.

Abstract not provided.

Michelen Strofer, Carlos A.; Neary, Vincent S.; Coe, Ryan G.

Abstract not provided.