Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies (OFCT) has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct research and development (R&D) activities related to storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and high level radioactive waste (HLW). The U.S. has, in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Waste Policy Act (as amended), focused efforts for the past twentyplus years on disposing of UNF and HLW in a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The recent decision by the U.S. DOE to no longer pursue the development of that repository has necessitated investigating alternative concepts for the disposal of UNF and HLW that exists today and that could be generated under future fuel cycles. The disposal of UNF and HLW in a range of geologic media has been investigated internationally. Considerable progress has been made by in the U.S and other nations, but gaps in knowledge still exist. The U.S. national laboratories have participated in these programs and have conducted R&D related to these issues to a limited extent. However, a comprehensive R&D program investigating a variety of storage, geologic media, and disposal concepts has not been a part of the U.S. waste management program since the mid 1980s because of its focus on the Yucca Mountain site. Such a comprehensive R&D program is being developed and executed in the UFDC using a systematic approach to identify potential R&D opportunities. This paper describes the process used by the UFDC to identify and prioritize R&D opportunities. The U.S. DOE has cooperated and collaborated with other countries in many different "arenas" including the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and through bilateral agreements with other countries. These international activities benefited the DOE through the acquisition and exchange of information, database development, and peer reviews by experts from other countries. Recognizing that programs in other countries have made significant advances in understanding a wide range of geologic environments, the UFDC has developed a strategy for continued, and expanded, international collaboration. This paper also describes this strategy. Copyright © 2011 by ASME.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The safe management and disposition of used nuclear fuel and/or high level nuclear waste is a fundamental aspect of the nuclear fuel cycle. The United States currently utilizes a once-through fuel cycle where used nuclear fuel is stored on-site in either wet pools or in dry storage systems with ultimate disposal in a deep mined geologic repository envisioned. However, a decision not to use the proposed Yucca Mountain Repository will result in longer interim storage at reactor sites than previously planned. In addition, alternatives to the once-through fuel cycle are being considered and a variety of options are being explored under the U.S. Department of Energy's Fuel Cycle Technologies Program. These two factors lead to the need to develop a credible strategy for managing radioactive wastes from any future nuclear fuel cycle in order to provide acceptable disposition pathways for all wastes regardless of transmutation system technology, fuel reprocessing scheme(s), and/or the selected fuel cycle. These disposition paths will involve both the storing of radioactive material for some period of time and the ultimate disposal of radioactive waste. To address the challenges associated with waste management, the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign in the summer of 2009. The mission of the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign is to identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The near-and long-term objectives of the Fuel Cycle Technologies Program and its ' Used Fuel Disposition Campaign are presented.

Published results of performance assessments for deep geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel provide insight into those aspects of the waste form that are potentially important to the long-term performance of a repository system. Alternative waste forms, such as might result from new technologies for processing spent fuel and advances in nuclear reactor design, have the potential to affect the long-term performance of a geologic repository. This paper reviews relevant results of existing performance assessments for a range of disposal concepts and provides observations about how hypothetical modifications to waste characteristics (e.g., changes in radionuclide inventory, thermal loading, and durability of waste forms) might impact results of the performance assessment models. Disposal concepts considered include geologic repositories in both saturated and unsaturated environments. Specifically, we consider four recent performance assessments as representative of a range of disposal concepts. We examine the extent to which results of these performance assessments are affected by (i) thermal loading of the waste proposed for disposal; (ii) mechanical and chemical lifetime of the waste form; and (iii) radionuclide content of the waste. We find that peak subsurface temperature generally is a constraint that can be met through engineering solutions and that processing of wastes to reduce thermal power may enable more efficient use of repositories rather than improved repository performance. We observe that the rate of radionuclide release is often limited by geologic or chemical processes other than waste form degradation. Thus, the effects on repository performance of extending waste-form lifetime may be relatively small unless the waste form lifetime becomes sufficiently long relative to the period of repository performance. Finally, we find that changes to radionuclide content of waste (e.g., by separation or transmutation processes) do not in general correspond to proportional effects on repository performance. Rather, the effect of changes to radionuclide content depends on the relative mobility of various radionuclides through the repository system, and consequently on repository geology and geochemistry.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.