Publications

Results 101–125 of 192
Skip to search filters

Comparative shock response of additively manufactured versus conventionally wrought 304L stainless steel

AIP Conference Proceedings

Wise, Jack L.; Adams, David P.; Nishida, E.E.; Song, Bo S.; Maguire, M.C.; Carroll, Jay D.; Reedlunn, Benjamin R.; Bishop, Joseph E.; Palmer, T.A.

Gas-gun experiments have probed the compression and release behavior of impact-loaded 304L stainless steel specimens that were machined from additively manufactured (AM) blocks as well as baseline ingot-derived bar stock. The AM technology permits direct fabrication of net-or near-net-shape metal parts. For the present investigation, velocity interferometer (VISAR) diagnostics provided time-resolved measurements of sample response for onedimensional (i.e., uniaxial strain) shock compression to peak stresses ranging from 0.2 to 7.0 GPa. The acquired waveprofile data have been analyzed to determine the comparative Hugoniot Elastic Limit (HEL), Hugoniot equation of state, spall strength, and high-pressure yield strength of the AM and conventional materials. The possible contributions of various factors, such as composition, porosity, microstructure (e.g., grain size and morphology), residual stress, and/or sample axis orientation relative to the additive manufacturing deposition trajectory, are considered to explain differences between the AM and baseline 304L dynamic material results.

More Details
TYPE Conference Poster YEAR 2017
ScopusOSTI

Mechanisms for Ductile Rupture - FY16 ESC Progress Report

Boyce, Brad B.; Carroll, Jay D.; Noell, Philip N.; Bufford, Daniel C.; Clark, Blythe C.; Hattar, Khalid M.; Lim, Hojun L.; Battaile, Corbett C.

Ductile rupture in metals is generally a multi-step process of void nucleation, growth, and coalescence. Particle decohesion and particle fracture are generally invoked as the primary microstructural mechanisms for room-temperature void nucleation. However, because high-purity materials also fail by void nucleation and coalescence, other microstructural features must also act as sites for void nucleation. Early studies of void initiation in high-purity materials, which included post-mortem fracture surface characterization using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high-voltage electron microscopy (HVEM) and in-situ HVEM observations of fracture, established the presence of dislocation cell walls as void initiation sites in high-purity materials. Direct experimental evidence for this contention was obtained during in-situ HVEM tensile tests of Be single crystals. Voids between 0.2 and 1 μm long appeared suddenly along dislocation cell walls during tensile straining. However, subsequent attempts to replicate these results in other materials, particularly α -Fe single crystals, were unsuccessful because of the small size of the dislocation cells, and these remain the only published in-situ HVEM observations of void nucleation at dislocation cell walls in the absence of a growing macrocrack. Despite this challenge, other approaches to studying void nucleation in high-purity metals also indicate that dislocation cell walls are nucleation sites for voids.

More Details
TYPE Other Report YEAR 2017
OSTIDOI
Results 101–125 of 192
Results 101–125 of 192