This report presents a generic (i.e., site-independent) preliminary plan for drilling, testing, sampling, and analyzing data for a deep characterization borehole drilled into crystalline basement for the purposes of assessing the suitability of a site for deep borehole disposal (DBD). This research was performed as part of the deep borehole field test (DBFT). Based on revised U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) priorities in mid-2017, the DBFT and other research related to a DBD option was discontinued; ongoing work and documentation were closed out by the end of fiscal year (FY) 2017. This report was initiated as part of the DBFT and documented as an incomplete draft at the end of FY 2017. The report was finalized by Sandia National Laboratories in FY2018 without DOE funding, subsequent to the termination of the DBFT, and published in FY2019. This report presents a possible sampling, testing, and analysis campaign that could be carried out as part of a future project to quantify geochemical, geomechanical, geothermal, and geohydrologic conditions encountered at depths up to 5 km in crystalline basement.
This report presents a preclosure radiological safety assessment for deep borehole disposal (DBD) of nuclear wastes. The primary purpose of the safety assessment is to identify risk factors for disposal operations, to aid in design for an engineering demonstration of technology for DBD. The assessment is based on a conceptual design for disposal packages and borehole systems that was developed previously. It considers operational steps that could be used for actual DBD, with internal and external initiating off-normal events, to develop insights that can be applied to an engineering demonstration that would be performed without using any form of nuclear waste. This research was performed as part of the deep borehole field test (DBFT). Based on revised U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) priorities in mid-2017, the DBFT and other research related to a DBD option was discontinued; ongoing work and documentation were closed out by the end of fiscal year (FY) 2017. This report was initiated as part of the DBFT and documented as an incomplete draft at the end of FY 2017. The report was finalized by Sandia National Laboratories in FY2018 without DOE funding, subsequent to the termination of the DBFT, and published in FY2019. iii
This report is the deliverable M2SF-18SN010305026 FY18 Summary Update on the Feasibility of Direct Disposal of SNF in Existing DPCs. It reports on work done throughout fiscal year (FY) 2018, on work planned at the beginning of that FY, consisting of R&D activities for: 1) injectable fillers that could be used in dual-purpose canisters to prevent postclosure criticality in a geologic repository, and 2) as-loaded DPC data gathering and criticality. The work reported here was performed by Sandia National Laboratories and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Appropriate attribution to source documents is provided in the text, tables, and figures below. Additional R&D on direct disposal of existing DPCs was planned and funded in mid-FY, and the associated reporting is separate from this milestone. Additional discussion of that new scope and how it implements findings from an independent expert review of the fillers R&D program (Section 10) is provided in the Summary (Section 11).
There are currently 2,462 dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) containing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) across the United States. Repackaging DPCs into specialized disposal canisters can be financially and operationally costly with undue risks. Technical feasibility of direct disposal of DPCs has been evaluated by the Department of Energy (DOE) and industry over the past 15 years. A concerted effort most recently conducted by DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) research and development (R&D) programs is evaluating the technical feasibility of direct disposal of DPCs in various geologies. This report focuses on reviewing the work completed by SFWST for the criticality considerations of DPC geologic disposal. Disposal of DPCs is not only viable, but assured from a technical and assumed regulatory perspective (similar to 10 CFR 63). The analysis approach should be multi-faceted to ensure effective implementation of a licensing basis. Recommendations are provided in this report that could enhance the bases for direct disposal of DPCs by exploiting all technically attainable and regulatorily defensible options. The review objectives, including addressing several questions regarding the value of accumulating asloaded fuel and DPC design data, suitability of DPC designs for disposal, and reasonable modifications for loading of DPCs that could facilitate eventual disposal, are also addressed in this report.
This report supplements Joint Workplan on Filler Investigations for DPCs (SNL 2017) providing new and some corrected information for use in planning Phase 1 laboratory testing of slurry cements as possible DPC fillers. The scope description is to "Describe a complete laboratory testing program for filler composition, delivery, emplacement in surrogate canisters, and post-test examination. To the extent possible specify filler material and equipment sources." This report includes results from an independent expert review (Dr. Arun Wagh, retired from Argonne National Laboratory and contracted by Sandia) that helped to narrow the range of cement types for consideration, and to provide further guidance on mix variations to optimize injectability, durability, and other aspects of filler performance.
This workplan addresses filler attributes (i.e., possible requirements), assumptions needed for analysis, selection of filler materials, testing needs, and a long-range perspective on R&D activities leading to filler demonstration and a safety basis for implementation.