Publications

Lamppa, Derek C.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Lucero, Larry M.; Rovang, Dean C.; Kaye, Ronald J.; Meissner, Joel M.; Ales, Matt A.

Abstract not provided.

Physics of Plasmas

Shipley, Gabriel A.; Awe, T.J.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Slutz, S.A.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Greenly, J.B.; Hutchinson, T.M.

Auto-magnetizing (AutoMag) liners [Slutz et al., Phys. Plasmas 24, 012704 (2017)] are designed to generate up to 100 T of axial magnetic field in the fuel for Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion [Slutz et al., Phys. Plasmas 17, 056303 (2010)] without the need for external field coils. AutoMag liners (cylindrical tubes) are composed of discrete metallic helical conduction paths separated by electrically insulating material. Initially, helical current in the AutoMag liner produces internal axial magnetic field during a long (100 to 300 ns) current prepulse with an average current rise rate d I / d t = 5 k A / n s. After the cold fuel is magnetized, a rapidly rising current (200 k A / n s) generates a calculated electric field of 64 M V / m between the helices. Such field is sufficient to force dielectric breakdown of the insulating material after which liner current is reoriented from helical to predominantly axial which ceases the AutoMag axial magnetic field production mechanism and the z-pinch liner implodes. Proof of concept experiments have been executed on the Mykonos linear transformer driver to measure the axial field produced by a variety of AutoMag liners and to evaluate what physical processes drive dielectric breakdown. A range of field strengths have been generated in various cm-scale liners in agreement with magnetic transient simulations including a measured field above 90 T at I = 350 kA. By varying the helical pitch angle, insulator material, and insulator geometry, favorable liner designs have been identified for which breakdown occurs under predictable and reproducible field conditions.

Coffey, Sean K.; Grabowski, Theodore C.; Owens, Israel O.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Lucero, Larry M.

Abstract not provided.

Physical Review Accelerators and Beams

Hutsel, Brian T.; Corcoran, Patrick A.; Cuneo, M.E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Hess, Mark H.; Hinshelwood, D.D.; Jennings, C.A.; Laity, G.R.; Lamppa, Derek C.; McBride, Ryan D.; Moore, James M.; Myers, A.; Rose, D.V.; Slutz, S.A.; Stygar, William A.; Waisman, Eduardo M.; Welch, Dale R.; Whitney, B.A.

We have developed a physics-based transmission-line-circuit model of the Z pulsed-power accelerator. The 33-m-diameter Z machine generates a peak electrical power as high as 85 TW, and delivers as much as 25 MA to a physics load. The circuit model is used to design and analyze experiments conducted on Z. The model consists of 36 networks of transmission-line-circuit elements and resistors that represent each of Zs 36 modules. The model of each module includes a Marx generator, intermediate-energy-storage capacitor, laser-triggered gas switch, pulse-forming line, self-break water switches, and tri-plate transmission lines. The circuit model also includes elements that represent Zs water convolute, vacuum insulator stack, four parallel outer magnetically insulated vacuum transmission lines (MITLs), double-post-hole vacuum convolute, inner vacuum MITL, and physics load. Within the vacuum-transmission-line system the model conducts analytic calculations of current loss. To calculate the loss, the model simulates the following processes: (i) electron emission from MITL cathode surfaces wherever an electric-field threshold has been exceeded; (ii) electron loss in the MITLs before magnetic insulation has been established; (iii) flow of electrons emitted by the outer-MITL cathodes after insulation has been established; (iv) closure of MITL anode-cathode (AK) gaps due to expansion of cathode plasma; (v) energy loss to MITL conductors operated at high lineal current densities; (vi) heating of MITL-anode surfaces due to conduction current and deposition of electron kinetic energy; (vii) negative-space-charge-enhanced ion emission from MITL anode surfaces wherever an anode-surface-temperature threshold has been exceeded; and (viii) closure of MITL AK gaps due to expansion of anode plasma. The circuit model is expected to be most accurate when the fractional current loss is small. We have performed circuit simulations of 52 Z experiments conducted with a variety of accelerator configurations and load-impedance time histories. For these experiments, the apparent fractional current loss varies from 0% to 20%. Results of the circuit simulations agree with data acquired on 52 shots to within 2%.

Bliss, David E.; McBride, Ryan D.; Martin, Matthew; Lamppa, Derek C.; Intrator, Tom P.

Abstract not provided.

Review of Scientific Instruments

Schollmeier, Marius; Knapp, P.F.; Ampleford, David A.; Harding, Eric H.; Jennings, C.A.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Loisel, G.P.; Martin, M.R.; Robertson, Grafton K.; Shores, J.E.; Smith, Ian C.; Speas, C.S.; Weis, M.R.; Porter, John L.; McBride, Ryan D.

Many experiments on Sandia National Laboratories' Z Pulsed Power Facility - a 30 MA, 100 ns rise-time, pulsed-power driver - use a monochromatic quartz crystal backlighter system at 1.865 keV (Si Heα) or 6.151 keV (Mn Heα) x-ray energy to radiograph an imploding liner (cylindrical tube) or wire array z-pinch. The x-ray source is generated by the Z-Beamlet laser, which provides two 527-nm, 1 kJ, 1-ns laser pulses. Radiographs of imploding, thick-walled beryllium liners at convergence ratios CR above 15 [CR=ri(0)/ri(t)] using the 6.151-keV backlighter system were too opaque to identify the inner radius ri of the liner with high confidence, demonstrating the need for a higher-energy x-ray radiography system. Here, we present a 7.242 keV backlighter system using a Ge(335) spherical crystal with the Co Heα resonance line. This system operates at a similar Bragg angle as the existing 1.865 keV and 6.151 keV backlighters, enhancing our capabilities for two-color, two-frame radiography without modifying the system integration at Z. The first data taken at Z include 6.2-keV and 7.2-keV two-color radiographs as well as radiographs of low-convergence (CR about 4-5), high-areal-density liner implosions.

Review of Scientific Instruments

Awe, T.J.; Shelton, Keegan P.; Sefkow, Adam B.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Baker, J.L.; Rovang, Dean C.; Robertson, Grafton K.

A cryogenically cooled hardware platform has been developed and commissioned on the Z Facility at Sandia National Laboratories in support of the Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion (MagLIF) Program. MagLIF is a magneto-inertial fusion concept that employs a magnetically imploded metallic tube (liner) to compress and inertially confine premagnetized and preheated fusion fuel. The fuel is preheated using a ∼2 kJ laser that must pass through a ∼1.5-3.5-μm-thick polyimide "window" at the target's laser entrance hole (LEH). As the terawatt-class laser interacts with the dense window, laser plasma instabilities (LPIs) can develop, which reduce the preheat energy delivered to the fuel, initiate fuel contamination, and degrade target performance. Cryogenically cooled targets increase the parameter space accessible to MagLIF target designs by allowing nearly 10 times thinner windows to be used for any accessible gas density. Thinner LEH windows reduce the deleterious effects of difficult to model LPIs. The Z Facility's cryogenic infrastructure has been significantly altered to enable compatibility with the premagnetization and fuel preheat stages of MagLIF. The MagLIF cryostat brings the liquid helium coolant directly to the target via an electrically resistive conduit. This design maximizes cooling power while allowing rapid diffusion of the axial magnetic field supplied by external Helmholtz-like coils. A variety of techniques have been developed to mitigate the accumulation of ice from vacuum chamber contaminants on the cooled LEH window, as even a few hundred nanometers of ice would impact laser energy coupling to the fuel region. The MagLIF cryostat has demonstrated compatibility with the premagnetization and preheat stages of MagLIF and the ability to cool targets to liquid deuterium temperatures in approximately 5 min.

Johnson, Drew J.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Jones, Michael J.; Radovich, S.

Abstract not provided.

Gomez, Matthew R.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Weis, Matthew R.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Ampleford, David A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Bliss, David E.; Chandler, Gordon A.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Harding, Eric H.; Hess, Mark H.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Laity, George R.; Martin, Matthew; Nagayama, Taisuke N.; Rovang, Dean C.; Ruiz, Carlos L.; Savage, Mark E.; Schmit, Paul S.; Schwarz, Jens S.; Smith, Ian C.; Vesey, Roger A.; Yu, Edmund Y.; Cuneo, M.E.; Jones, Brent M.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Porter, John L.; Rochau, G.A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Stygar, William A.

Abstract not provided.

Awe, Thomas J.; Shelton, Keegan P.; Sefkow, Adam B.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Baker, J.L.; Rovang, Dean C.; Aragon, Carlos A.; Robertson, Grafton K.

Abstract not provided.

Lamppa, Derek C.; Vandevender, J.P.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Jobe, Marc R.; Aragon, Carlos A.; Robertson, Grafton K.; Laity, George R.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Ampleford, David A.; Cuneo, M.E.

Abstract not provided.

Hutsel, Brian T.; Corcoran, Patrick A.; Cuneo, M.E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Hinshelwood, Dave H.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Jones, Michael J.; Laity, George R.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Moore, James M.; Myers, Allanah M.; Rose, David V.; Stygar, William A.; Waisman, Eduardo M.; Welch, Dale R.; Whitney, Brandon W.

Abstract not provided.

Lamppa, Derek C.; Vandevender, J.P.; Jobe, Marc R.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Laity, George R.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Ampleford, David A.; Cuneo, M.E.

Abstract not provided.

Laity, George R.; Aragon, Carlos A.; Dolan, Daniel H.; Falcon, Ross E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Hess, Mark H.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Johnston, Mark D.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Patel, Sonal P.; Porwitzky, Andrew J.; Vandevender, J.P.; Webb, Timothy J.; Rochau, G.A.; Stygar, William A.; Cuneo, M.E.

Abstract not provided.

Ampleford, David A.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Harding, Eric H.; Schmit, Paul S.; Weis, Matthew R.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Awe, Thomas J.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Rochau, G.A.

Abstract not provided.

Fierro, Andrew S.; Laity, George R.; Moore, Christopher H.; Hopkins, Matthew M.; Tang, Ricky T.; Cartwright, Keith C.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Hess, Mark H.; Vandevender, J.P.

Abstract not provided.

Gomez, Matthew R.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Martin, Matthew; Cuneo, M.E.; Hess, Mark H.; Laity, George R.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Rochau, G.A.; Rovang, Dean C.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Stygar, William A.

Abstract not provided.

Physics of Plasmas

Slutz, S.A.; Jennings, C.A.; Awe, T.J.; Shipley, Gabriel A.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Lamppa, Derek C.

The MagLIF (Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion) concept [Slutz et al., Phys. Plasmas 17, 056303 (2010)] has demonstrated fusion-relevant plasma conditions [Gomez et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 155003 (2014)] on the Z accelerator using external field coils to magnetize the fuel before compression. We present a novel concept (AutoMag), which uses a composite liner with helical conduction paths separated by insulating material to provide fuel magnetization from the early part of the drive current, which by design rises slowly enough to avoid electrical breakdown of the insulators. Once the magnetization field is established, the drive current rises more quickly, which causes the insulators to break down allowing the drive current to follow an axial path and implode the liner in the conventional z-pinch manner. There are two important advantages to AutoMag over external field coils for the operation of MagLIF. Low inductance magnetically insulated power feeds can be used to increase the drive current, and AutoMag does not interfere with diagnostic access. Also, AutoMag enables a pathway to energy applications for MagLIF, since expensive field coils will not be damaged each shot. Finally, it should be possible to generate Field Reversed Configurations (FRC) by using both external field coils and AutoMag in opposite polarities. This would provide a means to studying FRC liner implosions on the 100 ns time scale.

McBride, Ryan D.; Bliss, David E.; Martin, Matthew; Jennings, Christopher A.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Dolan, Daniel H.; Lemke, Raymond W.; Rovang, Dean C.; Rochau, G.A.; Cuneo, M.E.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Intrator, Thomas P.; Weber, Thomas E.

Abstract not provided.

Physics of Plasmas

Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Jennings, C.A.; Jones, Brent M.; Apruzese, J.P.; Ampleford, David A.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Coverdale, Christine A.; Cuneo, M.E.; Giuliani, J.L.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Jones, Brent M.; Moore, Nathan W.; Rochau, G.A.; Thornhill, J.W.

Double-shell Ar gas puff implosions driven by 16.5 ± 0.5 MA on the Z generator at Sandia National Laboratories are very effective emitters of Ar K-shell radiation (photon energy >3 keV), producing yields of 330 ± 9% kJ [B. Jones et al., Phys. Plasmas 22, 020706 (2015)]. Previous simulations and experiments have reported dramatic increases in K-shell yields when adding an on-axis jet to double shell gas puffs for some configurations. We report on a series of experiments on Z testing Ar gas puff configurations with and without an on-axis jet guided by 3D magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) simulations. Adding an on-axis jet was found to significantly improve the performance of some, but not all, configurations. The maximum observed K-shell yield of 375 ± 9% kJ was produced with a configuration that rapidly imploded onto an on-axis jet. A dramatic difference was observed in the plasma conditions at stagnation when a jet was used, producing a narrower stagnation column in experiments with a higher density but relatively lower electron temperature. The MHD simulations accurately reproduce the experimental measurements. The conversion efficiency for electrical energy delivered to the load to K-shell x-rays is estimated to be ∼12.5% for the best-performing configuration, similar to the best results from experiments at smaller facilities.

Slutz, Stephen A.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Shipley, Gabriel A.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Lamppa, Derek C.

Abstract not provided.

Awe, Thomas J.; Shipley, Gabriel A.; Hutchinson, Trevor M.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Jaramillo, Deanna M.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Lucero, Diego J.; Lucero, Larry M.; McBride, Ryan D.; Slutz, Stephen A.

Magneti zed Liner Inerti al Fusion (MagLIF ) is an inertial confinement fusion (ICF) concept that includes a strong magnetic field embedded in the fuel to mitigate thermal conduction loss during the implosion . MagLIF experiments on Sandia's 20 MA Z Machine uses an external Helmholtz - like coil pair for fuel premagnetization . By contrast, t he novel AutoMag concept employs a composite liner (cylindrical tube) with helically oriented conduction paths separated by insulating material to provide axial premagnetization of the fuel . Initially, during a current prepulse that slowly rises to %7E1 MA, current flows helically through the AutoMag liner , and so urces the fuel with an axial field . Next, a rapidly rising main current pulse breaks down the insulation and current in th e liner becomes purely axial. The liner and premagnetized fuel are then compressed by the rapidly growing azimuthal field external to t he liner. This integrated axial - field - production mechanism offers a few potential advantages when compared to the externa l premagnetization coils. AutoMag can increase drive current to MagLIF experiments by enabling a lower inductance transmission line , provide higher premagnetization field (>30 T), and greatly increase radial x - ray diagnostic access. 3D electromagnetic si mulations using ANSYS Maxwell have been completed in order to explore the current distributions within the helical conduction paths, the inter - wire dielectric strength properties, and the thermal properties of the helical conduction paths during premagneti zation (%7E1 MA in 100ns). Th ree liner designs , of varying peak field strength, and associated varying risk of dielectric breakdown, will soon be tested in experiments on the %7E 1 MA, 100ns Mykonos facility. Experiments will measure B z (t) inside of the line r and assess failure mechanisms.

Hahn, Kelly D.; Chandler, Gordon A.; Ruiz, Carlos L.; Cooper, Gary W.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Sefkow, Adam B.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Schmit, Paul S.; Harding, Eric H.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Rovang, Dean C.; Torres, Jose A.; Bur, James A.; Cuneo, M.E.; Glebov, V.Yu.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Hess, Mark H.; Johns, Owen J.; Jones, Brent M.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Lash, Joel S.; Martin, Matthew; McBride, Ryan D.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Porter, John L.; Reneker, Joseph R.; Robertson, Grafton K.; Rochau, G.A.; Savage, Mark E.; Smith, Ian C.; Styron, Jedediah D.; Vesey, Roger A.

Abstract not provided.

Hahn, Kelly D.; Chandler, Gordon A.; Ruiz, Carlos L.; Cooper, Gary W.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Sefkow, Adam B.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Schmit, Paul S.; Harding, Eric H.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Rovang, Dean C.; Torres, Jose A.; Bur, James A.; Cuneo, M.E.; Glebov, V.Yu.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Hess, Mark H.; Johns, Owen J.; Jones, Brent M.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Lash, Joel S.; Martin, Matthew; McBride, Ryan D.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Porter, John L.; Reneker, Joseph R.; Robertson, Grafton K.; Rochau, G.A.; Savage, Mark E.; Smith, Ian C.; Styron, Jedediah D.; Vesey, Roger A.

Abstract not provided.

Shipley, Gabriel A.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Jennings, Christopher A.; McBride, Ryan D.

Abstract not provided.