Publications

Debusschere, Bert D.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Chowdhary, Kamaljit S.

Abstract not provided.

Safta, Cosmin S.; Huan, Xun H.; Geraci, Gianluca G.; Eldred, Michael S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Vane, Zachary P.; Oefelein, Joseph C.; Najm, H.N.

Abstract not provided.

AIAA Journal

Huan, Xun H.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Geraci, Gianluca G.; Eldred, Michael S.; Vane, Zachary P.; Lacaze, Guilhem M.; Oefelein, Joseph C.; Najm, H.N.

The development of scramjet engines is an important research area for advancing hypersonic and orbital flights. Progress toward optimal engine designs requires accurate flow simulations together with uncertainty quantification. However, performing uncertainty quantification for scramjet simulations is challenging due to the large number of uncertainparameters involvedandthe high computational costofflow simulations. These difficulties are addressedin this paper by developing practical uncertainty quantification algorithms and computational methods, and deploying themin the current studyto large-eddy simulations ofajet incrossflow inside a simplified HIFiRE Direct Connect Rig scramjet combustor. First, global sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify influential uncertain input parameters, which can help reduce the system's stochastic dimension. Second, because models of different fidelity are used in the overall uncertainty quantification assessment, a framework for quantifying and propagating the uncertainty due to model error is presented. These methods are demonstrated on a nonreacting jet-in-crossflow test problem in a simplified scramjet geometry, with parameter space up to 24 dimensions, using static and dynamic treatments of the turbulence subgrid model, and with two-dimensional and three-dimensional geometries.

Peterson, Kara J.; Parks, Michael L.; Ackerman, Eric A.; Bambha, Ray B.; Bull, Diana L.; Frederick, Jennifer M.; Hardesty, Jasper O.; Ilgen, Anastasia G.; Jakeman, John D.; Powell, Amy J.; Peterson, Matthew G.; Roesler, Erika L.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Stracuzzi, David J.; Kalashnikova, Irina

Abstract not provided.

Debusschere, Bert D.; Templeton, Jeremy A.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Pinar, Ali P.; Najm, H.N.

Abstract not provided.

Huan, Xun H.; Geraci, Gianluca G.; Vane, Zachary P.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Eldred, Michael S.; Oefelein, Joseph C.; Najm, H.N.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.

Abstract not provided.

Debusschere, Bert D.; Templeton, Jeremy A.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Pinar, Ali P.; Najm, H.N.

Abstract not provided.

Huan, Xun H.; Geraci, Gianluca G.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Eldred, Michael S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Vane, Zachary P.; Oefelein, Joseph C.; Najm, H.N.

Abstract not provided.

Safta, Cosmin S.; Huan, Xun H.; Eldred, Michael S.; Geraci, Gianluca G.

Abstract not provided.

Safta, Cosmin S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Ricciuto, Daniel R.

Abstract not provided.

Bambha, Ray B.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Cui, Xinguang C.; Michelsen, Hope A.; Jeong, Seongeun J.; Fischer, Marc L.

Abstract not provided.

Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Ricciuto, Daniel R.; Thornton, Peter T.; Najm, H.N.; Huan, Xun H.

Abstract not provided.

Bambha, Ray B.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Michelsen, Hope A.

Abstract not provided.

Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Chowdhary, Kamaljit S.; Castorena, Sarah C.; de Bord, Sarah d.; Debusschere, Bert D.

The UQ Toolkit (UQTk) is a collection of libraries and tools for the quantification of uncertainty in numerical model predictions. Version 3.0.4 offers intrusive and non-intrusive methods for propagating input uncertainties through computational models, tools for sensitivity analysis, methods for sparse surrogate construction, and Bayesian inference tools for inferring parameters from experimental data. This manual discusses the download and installation process for UQTk, provides pointers to the UQ methods used in the toolkit, and describes some of the examples provided with the toolkit.

Biogeosciences

Lu, Dan; Ricciuto, Daniel; Walker, Anthony; Safta, Cosmin S.; Munger, William

Calibration of terrestrial ecosystem models is important but challenging. Bayesian inference implemented by Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling provides a comprehensive framework to estimate model parameters and associated uncertainties using their posterior distributions. The effectiveness and efficiency of the method strongly depend on the MCMC algorithm used. In this work, a differential evolution adaptive Metropolis (DREAM) algorithm is used to estimate posterior distributions of 21 parameters for the data assimilation linked ecosystem carbon (DALEC) model using 14 years of daily net ecosystem exchange data collected at the Harvard Forest Environmental Measurement Site eddy-flux tower. The calibration of DREAM results in a better model fit and predictive performance compared to the popular adaptive Metropolis (AM) scheme. Moreover, DREAM indicates that two parameters controlling autumn phenology have multiple modes in their posterior distributions while AM only identifies one mode. The application suggests that DREAM is very suitable to calibrate complex terrestrial ecosystem models, where the uncertain parameter size is usually large and existence of local optima is always a concern. In addition, this effort justifies the assumptions of the error model used in Bayesian calibration according to the residual analysis. The result indicates that a heteroscedastic, correlated, Gaussian error model is appropriate for the problem, and the consequent constructed likelihood function can alleviate the underestimation of parameter uncertainty that is usually caused by using uncorrelated error models.

Debusschere, Bert D.; Rizzi, Francesco N.; Morris Wright, Karla V.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Najm, H.N.; Knio, Omar K.; Mycek, Paul M.; Contreras, Andres C.; Olivier, Le M.

Abstract not provided.

Najm, H.N.; Debusschere, Bert D.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Huan, Xun H.; Oefelein, Joseph C.; Vane, Zachary P.; Eldred, Michael S.; Geraci, G.G.; Knio, O.K.; Sraj, I.S.; Scovazzi, G.S.; Colomes, O.C.; Marzouk, Y.M.; Zahm, O.Z.; Menhorn, F.M.; Ghanem, R.G.; Tsilifis, P.T.

Abstract not provided.

Safta, Cosmin S.; Bambha, Ray B.; Michelsen, Hope A.

Abstract not provided.

Lao, Jacky L.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Lao, Jacky L.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Najm, H.N.

Abstract not provided.

Debusschere, Bert D.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Chowdhary, Kamaljit S.

Abstract not provided.

Debusschere, Bert D.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Chowdhary, Kamaljit S.

Abstract not provided.

Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification

Debusschere, Bert D.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Chowdhary, Kenny

The UQ Toolkit (UQTk) is a collection of tools for uncertainty quantification, ranging from intrusive and nonintrusive forward propagation of uncertainty to inverse problems and sensitivity analysis. This chapter first outlines the UQTk design philosophy, followed by an overview of the available methods and the way they are implemented in UQTk. The second part of this chapter is a detailed example that illustrates a UQ workflow from surrogate construction, and calibration, to forward propagation and attribution.

Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Chowdhary, Kamaljit S.; Castorena, Sarah C.; de Bord, Sarah d.; Debusschere, Bert D.

The UQ Toolkit (UQTk) is a collection of libraries and tools for the quantification of uncertainty in numerical model predictions. Version 3.0.3 offers intrusive and non-intrusive methods for propagating input uncertainties through computational models, tools for sen- sitivity analysis, methods for sparse surrogate construction, and Bayesian inference tools for inferring parameters from experimental data. This manual discusses the download and installation process for UQTk, provides pointers to the UQ methods used in the toolkit, and describes some of the examples provided with the toolkit.

Safta, Cosmin S.; Phipps, Eric T.; Najm, H.N.

Abstract not provided.

Huan, Xun H.; Safta, Cosmin S.; Geraci, Gianluca G.; Eldred, Michael S.; Vane, Zachary P.; Lacaze, Guilhem M.; Oefelein, Joseph C.; Sargsyan, Khachik S.; Najm, H.N.

Abstract not provided.