Thermoset polymers (e.g. epoxies, vulcanizable rubbers, polyurethanes, etc.) are crosslinked materials with excellent thermal, chemical, and mechanical stability; these properties make thermoset materials attractive for use in harsh applications and environments. Unfortunately, material robustness means that these materials persist in the environment with very slow degradation over long periods of time. Balancing the benefits of material performance with sustainability is a challenge in need of novel solutions. Here, we aimed to address this challenge by incorporating boronic acid-amine complexes into epoxy thermoset chemistries, facilitating degradation of the material under pH neutral to alkaline conditions; in this scenario, water acts as an initiator to remove boron species, creating a porous structure with an enhanced surface area that makes the material more amenable to environmental degradation. Furthermore, the expulsion of the boron leaves the residual pores rich in amines which can be exploited for CO2 absorption or other functionalization. We demonstrated the formation of novel boron species from neat mixing of amine compounds with boric acid, including one complex that appears highly stable under nitrogen atmosphere up to 600 °C. While degradation of the materials under static, alkaline conditions (our “trigger”) was inconclusive at the time of this writing, dynamic conditions appeared more promising. Additionally, we showed that increasing boronic acid content created materials more resistant to thermal degradation, thus improving performance under typical high temperature use conditions.
Alkali metals, such as lithium, sodium, potassium, etc., are highly reactive elements. While researchers generally handle these metals with caution, less caution is taken when these elements have been “reacted”. In this work, a recent incident is examined in which a pair of researchers ignited a lithium silicide alloy sample that was assumed to be fully hydrated to lithium hydroxide and, thereby, no longer water-reactive. However, variations in the original chemical composition of the lithium compounds examined resulted in select mixtures failing to hydrate and react completely to lithium hydroxide in the time frame allowed. This gave rise to residual unreacted, water-sensitive lithium silicide which resulted in a violent exothermic reaction with water and autoignition of the produced hydrogen gas. This Article describes this incident and improvements that can be implemented to prevent similar incidents from occurring.
Laboratory research can expose workers to a wide variety of chemical hazards. Researchers must not only take personal responsibility for their safety but also inevitably rely on coworkers to also work safely. The foundations for protocols, requirements, and behaviors come from our history and lessons learned from others. For that reason, here, a recent incident is examined in which a researcher suffered hydrofluoric acid (HF) burns while working with an inorganic digestion mixture of aqueous HF (8%) and nitric acid (HNO3, 58%). HF education is critical for workers because delays in treatment, improper treatment, and delay of symptoms are all factors in unfavorable outcomes in case reports. While the potential severity of the incident was elevated due to bypassed engineered controls and lack of proper personal protective equipment, only minor injuries were sustained. We discuss the results of a causal analysis of the incident that revealed areas of improvement in protocols, personal protective equipment, and emergency response that could help prevent similar accidents from occurring. We also present simple improvements that anyone can implement to reduce the potential consequences of an accident, based upon our lessons learned.
Energy storage systems with Li-ion batteries are increasingly deployed to maintain a robust and resilient grid and facilitate the integration of renewable energy resources. However, appropriate selection of cells for different applications is difficult due to limited public data comparing the most commonly used off-the-shelf Li-ion chemistries under the same operating conditions. This article details a multi-year cycling study of commercial LiFePO4 (LFP), LiNixCoyAl1-x-yO2 (NCA), and LiNixMnyCo1-x-yO2 (NMC) cells, varying the discharge rate, depth of discharge (DOD), and environment temperature. The capacity and discharge energy retention, as well as the round-trip efficiency, were compared. Even when operated within manufacturer specifications, the range of cycling conditions had a profound effect on cell degradation, with time to reach 80% capacity varying by thousands of hours and cycle counts among cells of each chemistry. The degradation of cells in this study was compared to that of similar cells in previous studies to identify universal trends and to provide a standard deviation for performance. All cycling files have been made publicly available at batteryarchive.org, a recently developed repository for visualization and comparison of battery data, to facilitate future experimental and modeling efforts.