Publications

Arrington, Christian L.; Dagel, Amber L.; Hollowell, Andrew E.; Finnegan, Patrick S.; Perez, Carlos P.; Baca, Kalin B.; Coleman, Jonathan J.; St John, Christopher S.

Abstract not provided.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Birch, Gabriel C.; Redman, Brian J.; Dagel, Amber L.; Kaehr, Bryan J.; Dagel, Daryl D.; LaCasse, Charles F.; Quach, Tu-Thach Q.; Galiardi, Meghan

We investigate the feasibility of additively manufacturing optical components to accomplish task-specific classification in a computational imaging device. We report on the design, fabrication, and characterization of a non-traditional optical element that physically realizes an extremely compressed, optimized sensing matrix. The compression is achieved by designing an optical element that only samples the regions of object space most relevant to the classification algorithms, as determined by machine learning algorithms. The design process for the proposed optical element converts the optimal sensing matrix to a refractive surface composed of a minimized set of non-repeating, unique prisms. The optical elements are 3D printed using a Nanoscribe, which uses two-photon polymerization for high-precision printing. We describe the design of several computational imaging prototype elements. We characterize these components, including surface topography, surface roughness, and angle of prism facets of the as-fabricated elements.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Dagel, Amber L.; West, Roger D.; Goodner, Ryan N.; Grover, Steven M.; Epstein, Collin E.; Thompson, Kyle R.

High-quality image products in an X-Ray Phase Contrast Imaging (XPCI) system can be produced with proper system hardware and data acquisition. However, it may be possible to further increase the quality of the image products by addressing subtleties and imperfections in both hardware and the data acquisition process. Noting that addressing these issues entirely in hardware and data acquisition may not be practical, a more prudent approach is to determine the balance of how the apparatus may reasonably be improved and what can be accomplished with image post-processing techniques. Given a proper signal model for XPCI data, image processing techniques can be developed to compensate for many of the image quality degradations associated with higher-order hardware and data acquisition imperfections. However, processing techniques also have limitations and cannot entirely compensate for sub-par hardware or inaccurate data acquisition practices. Understanding system and image processing technique limitations enables balancing between hardware, data acquisition, and image post-processing. In this paper, we present some of the higher-order image degradation effects we have found associated with subtle imperfections in both hardware and data acquisition. We also discuss and demonstrate how a combination of hardware, data acquisition processes, and image processing techniques can increase the quality of XPCI image products. Finally, we assess the requirements for high-quality XPCI images and propose reasonable system hardware modifications and the limits of certain image processing techniques.

Optics InfoBase Conference Papers

Redman, Brian J.; Dagel, Amber L.; Kaehr, Bryan; LaCasse, Charles F.; Birch, Gabriel C.; Quach, Tu-Thach Q.; Galiardi, Meghan A.

We report on the design and fabrication of a computational imaging element used within a compressive task-specific imaging system. Fabrication via two-photon 3D printing is reported, as well as characterization of the fabricated element.

Vincent, Michael D.; Ham, Kyungmin H.; J., Stryjewski W.; Johnson, Warren W.; Butler, Leslie G.; Dagel, Amber L.; West, Roger D.; Schulz, Joachim S.; Gruenzweig, Christian G.; Bilheux, Jean C.; Pearson, Matthew R.; Bailey, W.B.; Bilheux, Hassina B.

Abstract not provided.

Sahakian, Meghan A.; Quach, Tu-Thach Q.; Birch, Gabriel C.; LaCasse, Charles F.; Dagel, Amber L.

Abstract not provided.

Dagel, Amber L.

Abstract not provided.

Thompson, Kyle R.; Dagel, Amber L.; Goodner, Ryan N.; Epstein, Collin E.

Abstract not provided.

Hollowell, Andrew E.; Arrington, Christian L.; Finnegan, Patrick S.; McClain, Jaime L.; Musick, Katherine M.; Resnick, Paul J.; Volk, Steve; Dagel, Amber L.

Abstract not provided.

Finnegan, Patrick S.; Hollowell, Andrew E.; Arrington, Christian L.; Dagel, Amber L.

Abstract not provided.

Baca, Kalin B.; Arrington, Christian L.; Hollowell, Andrew E.; Finnegan, Patrick S.; Baca, Kalin B.; Pillars, Jamin R.; Dagel, Amber L.; Singh, V.S.; Nguyen, Q.N.

Abstract not provided.

Birch, Gabriel C.; Quach, Tu-Thach Q.; Sahakian, Meghan A.; LaCasse, Charles F.; Dagel, Amber L.

Abstract not provided.

Thompson, Kyle R.; Dagel, Amber L.; Goodner, Ryan N.

Abstract not provided.

Sahakian, Meghan A.; Birch, Gabriel C.; Quach, Tu-Thach Q.; Sahakian, Meghan A.; Stubbs, Jaclynn J.; Dagel, Amber L.; LaCasse, Charles F.

Abstract not provided.

Dagel, Amber L.

Abstract not provided.

Dagel, Amber L.; Arrington, Christian L.; Finnegan, Patrick S.; Goodner, Ryan N.; Hollowell, Andrew E.; Thompson, Kyle R.

Abstract not provided.

Dagel, Amber L.; Epstein, Collin E.

Abstract not provided.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Birch, Gabriel C.; Quach, Tu-Thach Q.; Galiardi, Meghan; LaCasse, Charles F.; Dagel, Amber L.

Advancements in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled imaging systems to perform complex classification tasks, opening numerous problem domains to solutions driven by high quality imagers coupled with algorithmic elements. However, current ML and DL methods for target classification typically rely upon algorithms applied to data measured by traditional imagers. This design paradigm fails to enable the ML and DL algorithms to influence the sensing device itself, and treats the optimization of the sensor and algorithm as separate sequential elements. Additionally, this current paradigm narrowly investigates traditional images, and therefore traditional imaging hardware, as the primary means of data collection. We investigate alternative architectures for computational imaging systems optimized for specific classification tasks, such as digit classification. This involves a holistic approach to the design of the system from the imaging hardware to algorithms. Techniques to find optimal compressive representations of training data are discussed, and most-useful object-space information is evaluated. Methods to translate task-specific compressed data representations into non-traditional computational imaging hardware are described, followed by simulations of such imaging devices coupled with algorithmic classification using ML and DL techniques. Our approach allows for inexpensive, efficient sensing systems. Reduced storage and bandwidth are achievable as well since data representations are compressed measurements which is especially important for high data volume systems.

Proceedings - International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology

Birch, Gabriel C.; Woo, Bryana L.; LaCasse, Charles F.; Stubbs, Jaclynn J.; Dagel, Amber L.

Physical unclonable functions (PUFs) are devices which are easily probed but difficult to predict. Optical PUFs have been discussed within the literature, with traditional optical PUFs typically using spatial light modulators, coherent illumination, and scattering volumes; however, these systems can be large, expensive, and difficult to maintain alignment in practical conditions. We propose and demonstrate a new kind of optical PUF based on computational imaging and compressive sensing to address these challenges with traditional optical PUFs. This work describes the design, simulation, and prototyping of this computational optical PUF (COPUF) that utilizes incoherent polychromatic illumination passing through an additively manufactured refracting optical polymer element. We demonstrate the ability to pass information through a COPUF using a variety of sampling methods, including the use of compressive sensing. The sensitivity of the COPUF system is also explored. We explore non-traditional PUF configurations enabled by the COPUF architecture. The double COPUF system, which employees two serially connected COPUFs, is proposed and analyzed as a means to authenticate and communicate between two entities that have previously agreed to communicate. This configuration enables estimation of a message inversion key without the calculation of individual COPUF inversion keys at any point in the PUF life cycle. Our results show that it is possible to construct inexpensive optical PUFs using computational imaging. This could lead to new uses of PUFs in places where electrical PUFs cannot be utilized effectively, as low cost tags and seals, and potentially as authenticating and communicating devices.

Hollowell, Andrew E.; Arrington, Christian L.; Coleman, Jonathan J.; Finnegan, Patrick S.; Perez, Carlos P.; Resnick, Paul J.; Dagel, Amber L.

Abstract not provided.

Baca, Kalin B.; Coleman, Jonathan J.; Pillars, Jamin R.; Finnegan, Patrick S.; Perez, Carlos P.; Seazzu, Micaela E.; Dyer, Isaac D.; St John, Christopher S.; Hollowell, Andrew E.; Dagel, Amber L.; Arrington, Christian L.

Abstract not provided.

Dagel, Amber L.; West, Roger D.

Abstract not provided.

Finnegan, Patrick S.; Arrington, Christian L.; Coleman, Jonathan J.; Dagel, Amber L.; Hollowell, Andrew E.; Perez, Carlos P.

Abstract not provided.

LaCasse, Charles F.; Birch, Gabriel C.; Dagel, Amber L.; Woo, Bryana L.

Abstract not provided.

Woo, Bryana L.; Birch, Gabriel C.; Woo, Bryana L.; LaCasse, Charles F.; Stubbs, Jaclynn J.; Dagel, Amber L.

Abstract not provided.