Process parameter selection in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) controls the as-printed dimensional tolerances, pore formation, surface quality and microstructure of printed metallic structures. Measuring the stochastic mechanical performance for a wide range of process parameters is cumbersome both in time and cost. In this study, we overcome these hurdles by using high-throughput tensile (HTT) testing of over 250 dogbone samples to examine process-driven performance of strut-like small features, ~1 mm2 in austenitic stainless steel (316 L). The output mechanical properties, porosity, surface roughness and dimensional accuracy were mapped across the printable range of laser powers and scan speeds using a continuous wave laser LPBF machine. Tradeoffs between ductility and strength are shown across the process space and their implications are discussed. While volumetric energy density deposited onto a substrate to create a melt-pool can be a useful metric for determining bulk properties, it was not found to directly correlate with output small feature performance.
In the pursuit of improving additively manufactured (AM) component quality and reliability, fine-tuning critical process parameters such as laser power and scan speed is a great first step toward limiting defect formation and optimizing the microstructure. However, the synergistic effects between these process parameters, layer thickness, and feedstock attributes (e.g. powder size distribution) on part characteristics such as microstructure, density, hardness, and surface roughness are not as well-studied. In this work, we investigate 316L stainless steel density cubes built via laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), emphasizing the significant microstructural changes that occur due to altering the volumetric energy density (VED) via laser power, scan speed, and layer thickness changes, coupled with different starting powder size distributions. This study demonstrates that there is not one ideal process set and powder size distribution for each machine. Instead, there are several combinations or feedstock/process parameter ‘recipes’ to achieve similar goals. This study also establishes that for equivalent VEDs, changing powder size can significantly alter part density, GND density, and hardness. Through proper parameter and feedstock control, part attributes such as density, grain size, texture, dislocation density, hardness, and surface roughness can be customized, thereby creating multiple high-performance regions in the AM process space.
This report provides detailed documentation of the algorithms that where developed and implemented in the Plato software over the course of the Optimization-based Design for Manufacturing LDRD project.