Publications

Moen, Christopher D.; Spence, Paul A.; Felter, Thomas E.; Dedrick, Daniel E.; Chiesa, Michael L.; Zimmerman, Jonathan A.; Gonzales, Mary E.; Harris, Aaron P.; Balch, Dorian K.

Abstract not provided.

Chiesa, Michael L.

Abstract not provided.

Brown, Arthur B.; Kostka, Timothy D.; Antoun, Bonnie R.; Chiesa, Michael L.; Margolis, Stephen B.; Yang, Nancy Y.

Abstract not provided.

Brown, Arthur B.; Margolis, Stephen B.; Margolis, Stephen B.; Antoun, Bonnie R.; Kostka, Timothy D.; Chiesa, Michael L.; Yang, Nancy Y.

Abstract not provided.

Antoun, Bonnie R.; Chiesa, Michael L.; O'Connor, Devin T.; Yang, Nancy Y.; San Marchi, Christopher W.; Brown, Arthur B.

Abstract not provided.

Chiesa, Michael L.

Abstract not provided.

Swiler, Laura P.; Hough, Patricia D.; Gray, Genetha A.; Chiesa, Michael L.; Heaphy, Robert T.; Thomas, Stephen W.; Trucano, Timothy G.

This project focused on research and algorithmic development in optimization under uncertainty (OUU) problems driven by earth penetrator (EP) designs. While taking into account uncertainty, we addressed three challenges in current simulation-based engineering design and analysis processes. The first challenge required leveraging small local samples, already constructed by optimization algorithms, to build effective surrogate models. We used Gaussian Process (GP) models to construct these surrogates. We developed two OUU algorithms using 'local' GPs (OUU-LGP) and one OUU algorithm using 'global' GPs (OUU-GGP) that appear competitive or better than current methods. The second challenge was to develop a methodical design process based on multi-resolution, multi-fidelity models. We developed a Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Auto-regressive process (MF-BAP). The third challenge involved the development of tools that are computational feasible and accessible. We created MATLAB{reg_sign} and initial DAKOTA implementations of our algorithms.

Chiesa, Michael L.; Settgast, Randolph R.; Kistler, Bruce L.; Bhutani, Nipun B.; Ohashi, Yuki O.; Ostien, Jakob O.; Antoun, Bonnie R.; Korellis, John S.; Marin, Esteban B.

Sandia currently lacks a high fidelity method for predicting loads on and subsequent structural response of earth penetrating weapons. This project seeks to test, debug, improve and validate methodologies for modeling earth penetration. Results of this project will allow us to optimize and certify designs for the B61-11, Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP), PEN-X and future nuclear and conventional penetrator systems. Since this is an ASC Advanced Deployment project the primary goal of the work is to test, debug, verify and validate new Sierra (and Nevada) tools. Also, since this project is part of the V&V program within ASC, uncertainty quantification (UQ), optimization using DAKOTA [1] and sensitivity analysis are an integral part of the work. This project evaluates, verifies and validates new constitutive models, penetration methodologies and Sierra/Nevada codes. In FY05 the project focused mostly on PRESTO [2] using the Spherical Cavity Expansion (SCE) [3,4] and PRESTO Lagrangian analysis with a preformed hole (Pen-X) methodologies. Modeling penetration tests using PRESTO with a pilot hole was also attempted to evaluate constitutive models. Future years work would include the Alegra/SHISM [5] and AlegrdEP (Earth Penetration) methodologies when they are ready for validation testing. Constitutive models such as Soil-and-Foam, the Sandia Geomodel [6], and the K&C Concrete model [7] were also tested and evaluated. This report is submitted to satisfy annual documentation requirements for the ASC Advanced Deployment program. This report summarizes FY05 work performed in the Penetration Mechanical Response (ASC-APPS) and Penetration Mechanics (ASC-V&V) projects. A single report is written to document the two projects because of the significant amount of technical overlap.

Marin, Esteban B.; Chiesa, Michael L.; Booker, Paul M.

A numerical screening study of the interaction between a penetrator and a geological target with a preformed hole has been carried out to identify the main parameters affecting the penetration event. The planning of the numerical experiment was based on the orthogonal array OA(18,7,3,2), which allows 18 simulation runs with 7 parameters at 3 levels each. The strength of 2 of the array allows also for two-factor interaction studies. The seven parameters chosen for this study are: penetrator offset, hole diameter, hole taper, vertical and horizontal velocity of the penetrator, angle of attack of the penetrator and target material. The analysis of the simulation results has been based on main effects plots and analysis of variance (ANOVA), and it has been performed using three metrics: the maximum values of the penetration depth, penetrator deceleration and plastic strain in the penetrator case. This screening study shows that target material has a major influence on penetration depth and penetrator deceleration, while penetrator offset has the strongest effect on the maximum plastic strain.

Chiesa, Michael L.; Antoun, Bonnie R.; Ostien, Jakob O.; Brown, Arthur B.; Bammann, Douglas J.

Abstract not provided.