Publications

15 Results
Skip to search filters

Dealing with measurement uncertainties as nuisance parameters in bayesian model calibration

SIAM-ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification

Rumsey, Kelin R.; Huerta, Jose G.; Brown, Justin L.; Hund, Lauren

In the presence of model discrepancy, the calibration of physics-based models for physical parameter inference is a challenging problem. Lack of identifiability between calibration parameters and model discrepancy requires additional identifiability constraints to be placed on the model discrepancy to obtain unique physical parameter estimates. If these assumptions are violated, the inference for the calibration parameters can be systematically biased. In many applications, such as in dynamic material property experiments, many of the calibration inputs refer to measurement uncertainties. In this setting, we develop a metric for identifying overfitting of these measurement uncertainties, propose a prior capable of reducing this overfitting, and show how this leads to a diagnostic tool for validation of physical parameter inference. The approach is demonstrated for a benchmark example and applied for a material property application to perform inference on the equation of state parameters of tantalum.

More Details
TYPE Journal Article YEAR 2020
ScopusOSTIDOI

Robust approaches to quantification of margin and uncertainty for sparse data

Hund, Lauren H.; Schroeder, Benjamin B.; Rumsey, Kelin R.; Murchison, Nicole M.

Characterizing the tails of probability distributions plays a key role in quantification of margins and uncertainties (QMU), where the goal is characterization of low probability, high consequence events based on continuous measures of performance. When data are collected using physical experimentation, probability distributions are typically fit using statistical methods based on the collected data, and these parametric distributional assumptions are often used to extrapolate about the extreme tail behavior of the underlying probability distribution. In this project, we character- ize the risk associated with such tail extrapolation. Specifically, we conducted a scaling study to demonstrate the large magnitude of the risk; then, we developed new methods for communicat- ing risk associated with tail extrapolation from unvalidated statistical models; lastly, we proposed a Bayesian data-integration framework to mitigate tail extrapolation risk through integrating ad- ditional information. We conclude that decision-making using QMU is a complex process that cannot be achieved using statistical analyses alone.

More Details
TYPE SAND Report YEAR 2017
OSTIDOI
15 Results
15 Results