Publications

First-of-their kind datasets from a high-speed X-ray tomography system were collected, and a novel numerical effort utilizing temporal information to reduce measurement uncertainty was shown. The experimental campaign used three high-speed X-ray imaging systems to collect data at 100 kHz of a scene containing high-velocity objects. The scene was a group of known objects propelled by a 12-gauge shotgun shell reaching speeds of hundreds of meters per second. These data represent a known volume where the individual components are known, with experimental uncertainties that can be used for reconstruction algorithm validation. The numerical effort used synthetic volumes in MATLAB to produce projections along known lines of sight to perform tomographic reconstructions. These projections and reconstructions were performed on a single object at two orientations, representing two timesteps, to increase the reconstruction accuracy.

X-ray stereo digital image correlation (DIC) measurements were performed at 10 kHz on a jointed-structure in a shock tube at a shock Mach number of 1.42. The X-ray results were compared to optical DIC using visible light. In the X-ray measurements, an internal surface with a tantalum-epoxy DIC pattern was imaged, whereas the optical DIC imaged an external surface. The environment within the shock tube caused temperature and density gradients in the gas through which the structure was imaged, therefore leading to spatial and temporal index of refraction variations. These variations caused beam-steering effects that resulted in bias error in optical DIC measurements. X-rays were used to mitigate the effects of beam-steering caused by the shock tube environment. Beam displacements measured using X-ray DIC followed similar trends (slopes, oscillations amplitudes and frequencies) as optical DIC data while ignoring beam-steering effects. Power spectral densities of both measurements showed peaks at the natural frequencies of the structure. X-ray DIC also has the advantage of being able to image internal structural responses, whereas optical DIC is only capable of measurements on the outer surface of objects.

Abstract not provided.