A cohesive phase-field model of ductile fracture in a finite-deformation setting is presented. The model is based on a free-energy function in which both elastic and plastic work contributions are coupled to damage. Using a strictly variational framework, the field evolution equations, damage kinetics, and flow rule are jointly derived from a scalar least-action principle. Particular emphasis is placed on the use of a rational function for the stress degradation that maintains a fixed effective strength with decreasing regularization length. The model is employed to examine crack growth in pure mode-I problems through the generation of crack growth resistance (J-R) curves. In contrast to alternative models, the current formulation gives rise to J-R curves that are insensitive to the regularization length. Numerical evidence suggests convergence of local fields with respect to diminishing regularization length as well.
Background: Using a thin-walled tube torsion test to characterize a material’s shear response is a well-known technique; however, the thin walled specimen tends to buckle before reaching large shear deformation and failure. An alternative technique is the surface stress method (Nadai 1950; Wu et al. J Test Eval 20:396–402, 1992), which derives a shear stress-strain curve from the torque-angular displacement relationship of a solid cylindrical bar. The solid bar torsion test uniquely stabilizes the deformation which allows us to control and explore very large shear deformation up to failure. However, this method has rarely been considered in the literature, possibly due to the complexity of the analysis and experimental issues such as twist measurement and specimen uniformity. Objective: In this investigation, we develop a method to measure the large angular displacement in the solid bar torsion experiments to study the large shear deformation of two common engineering materials, Al6061-T6 and SS304L, which have distinctive hardening behaviors. Methods: Modern stereo-DIC methods were applied to make deformation measurements. The large angular displacement of the specimen posed challenges for the DIC analysis. An analysis method using multiple reference configurations and transformation of deformation gradient is developed to make the large shear deformation measurement successful. Results: We successfully applied the solid bar torsion experiment and the new analysis method to measure the large shear deformation of Al6061-T6 and SS304L till specimen failure. The engineering shear strains at failure are on the order of 2–3 for Al6061-T6 and 3–4 for SS304L. Shear stress-strain curves of Al6061-T6 and SS304L are also obtained. Conclusions: Solid bar torsion experiments coupled with 3D-DIC technique and the new analysis method of deformation gradient transformation enable measurement of very large shear deformation up to specimen failure.
The method of thin-wall tube torsion to characterize metal’s shear response is well-known. Unfortunately, the thin wall tube specimen tends to buckle before reaching large shear deformation and failure. An alternative technique, which has rarely been considered, is Nadai’s surface stress method (Nadai, Theory of Flow and Fracture of Solids. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1950). It derives shear stress-strain curve from the torque-twist relationship of a solid bar. Although the analysis is more complex due to nonlinear shear stress distribution along the radius, the deformation is stable through large shear deformation to failure. Solid bar torsion experiments were conducted to study large shear deformation of Al6061-T6. Two experiments were described in this study. Since few tests were available in the literature, these experiments were to explore the large deformation behaviors of an engineering alloy and the application of modern measurement techniques, such as 3D DIC method, under torsion. Results show during twisting, the surface shear strain distribution was uniform initially and then localized on a narrow band; eventually, the specimen was cracked and failed within the band. Depending on the specimen size, the twist could be greater than 360°. Details are discussed.
This project has developed models of variability of performance to enable robust design and certification. Material variability originating from microstructure has significant effects on component behavior and creates uncertainty in material response. The outcomes of this project are uncertainty quantification (UQ) enabled analysis of material variability effects on performance and methods to evaluate the consequences of microstructural variability on material response in general. Material variability originating from heterogeneous microstructural features, such as grain and pore morphologies, has significant effects on component behavior and creates uncertainty around performance. Current engineering material models typically do not incorporate microstructural variability explicitly, rather functional forms are chosen based on intuition and parameters are selected to reflect mean behavior. Conversely, mesoscale models that capture the microstructural physics, and inherent variability, are impractical to utilize at the engineering scale. Therefore, current efforts ignore physical characteristics of systems that may be the predominant factors for quantifying system reliability. To address this gap we have developed explicit connections between models of microstructural variability and component/system performance. Our focus on variability of mechanical response due to grain and pore distributions enabled us to fully probe these influences on performance and develop a methodology to propagate input variability to output performance. This project is at the forefront of data-science and material modeling. We adapted and innovated from progressive techniques in machine learning and uncertainty quantification to develop a new, physically-based methodology to address the core issues of the Engineering Materials Reliability (EMR) research challenge in modeling constitutive response of materials with significant inherent variability and length-scales.
The advent of fabrication techniques such as additive manufacturing has focused attention on the considerable variability of material response due to defects and other microstructural aspects. This variability motivates the development of an enhanced design methodology that incorporates inherent material variability to provide robust predictions of performance. In this work, we develop plasticity models capable of representing the distribution of mechanical responses observed in experiments using traditional plasticity models of the mean response and recently developed uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques. To account for material response variability through variations in physical parameters, we adapt a recent Bayesian embedded modeling error calibration technique. We use Bayesian model selection to determine the most plausible of a variety of plasticity models and the optimal embedding of parameter variability. To expedite model selection, we develop an adaptive importance-sampling-based numerical integration scheme to compute the Bayesian model evidence. We demonstrate that the new framework provides predictive realizations that are superior to more traditional ones, and how these UQ techniques can be used in model selection and assessing the quality of calibrated physical parameters.
The third Sandia Fracture Challenge highlighted the geometric and material uncertainties introduced by modern additive manufacturing techniques. Tasked with the challenge of predicting failure of a complex additively-manufactured geometry made of 316L stainless steel, we combined a rigorous material calibration scheme with a number of statistical assessments of problem uncertainties. Specifically, we used optimization techniques to calibrate a rate-dependent and anisotropic Hill plasticity model to represent material deformation coupled with a damage model driven by void growth and nucleation. Through targeted simulation studies we assessed the influence of internal voids and surface flaws on the specimens of interest in the challenge which guided our material modeling choices. Employing the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test statistic, we developed a representative suite of simulations to account for the geometric variability of test specimens and the variability introduced by material parameter uncertainty. This approach allowed the team to successfully predict the failure mode of the experimental test population as well as the global response with a high degree of accuracy.