The Saturn accelerator has historically lacked the capability to measure time-resolved spectra for its 3-ring bremsstrahlung x-ray source. This project aimed to create a spectrometer called AXIOM to provide this capability. The project had three major development pillars: hardware, simulation, and unfold code. The hardware consists of a ring of 24 detectors around an existing x-ray pinhole camera. The diagnostic was fielded on two shots at Saturn and over 100 shots at the TriMeV accelerator at Idaho Accelerator Center. A new Saturn x-ray environment simulation was created using measured data to validate. This simulation allows for timeresolved spectra computation to compare the experimental results. The AXIOM-Unfold code is a new parametric unfold code using modern global optimizers and uncertainty quantification. The code was written in Python, uses Gitlab version control and issue tracking, and has been developed with long term code support and maintenance in mind.
The AXIOM-Unfold application is a computational code for performing spectral unfolds along with uncertainty quantification of the photon spectrum. While this code was principally designed for spectral unfolds on the Saturn source, it is also relevant to other radiation sources such as Pithon. This code is a component of the AXIOM project which was undertaken in order to measure the time-resolved spectrum of the Saturn source; to support this, the AXIOM-Unfold code is able to process time-dependent dose measurements in order to obtain a time-resolved spectrum. This manual contains a full description of the algorithms used by the method. The code features are fully documented along with several worked examples.
Systematic veri cation and validation (V&V) is necessary to establish the credibility for high consequence simulations. In this paper, we focus on a radiation-induced plasma experimental validation exercise for simulations which uses both numerical error estimation and input parameter uncertainty quanti cation to provide a direct comparison between Particle-In-Cell (PIC) plasma simulations and experiments. This approach demonstrates how careful validation can uncover missing physics in the simulation. Three di erent validation examples are shown; a vacuum space charge limited cavity, a gas lled space charge limited cavity, and a vacuum non space charge limited cavity. Two of the example are picked to show the importance of error estimation in uncovering inaccuracy/incomplete simulation models. We also report on a newly-developed numerical error estimation approach, StREEQ, which is a notable improvement to past approaches. In the StREEQ approach, a multi- tting scheme based on L1, L2, and L$\infty$ error norms and alternate weightings is used to propagate uncertainties in the relative importance of outliers and coarse/re ned discretization levels. Bootstrap sampling is used to represent the stochasticity in the response data. The resulting method appears to robustly and conservatively predict the fully-converged response within estimated numerical error bounds for stochastic simulations. The StREEQ approach is demonstrated on two related prototype electron diode problems, and preliminary results are reported for a radiation-induced plasma simulation.
The Light Initiated High Explosive (LIHE) facility performs high rigor, high consequence impulse testing for the nuclear weapons (NW) community. To support the facility mission, LIHE's extensive data acquisition system (DAS) is comprised of several discrete components as well as a fully integrated system. Due to the high consequence and high rigor of the testing performed at LIHE, a measurement assurance plan (MAP) was developed in collaboration with NW system customers to meet their data quality needs and to provide assurance of the robustness of the LIHE DAS. While individual components of the DAS have been calibrated by the SNL Primary Standards Laboratory (PSL), the integrated nature of this complex system requires verification of the complete system, from end-to-end. This measurement assurance plan (MAP) report documents the results of verification and validation procedures used to ensure that the data quality meets customer requirements.