Management of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste consists of three main phases – storage, transportation, and disposal – commonly referred to as the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. Current practice for commercial spent nuclear fuel management in the United States (US) includes temporary storage of spent fuel in both pools and dry storage systems at operating or shutdown nuclear power plants. Storage pools are filling to their operational capacity, and management of the approximately 2,200 metric tons of spent fuel newly discharged each year requires transferring older and cooler spent fuel from pools into dry storage. Unless a repository becomes available that can accept spent fuel for permanent disposal, projections indicate that the US will have approximately 136,000 metric tons of spent fuel in dry storage systems by mid-century, when the last plants in the current reactor fleet are decommissioned. Current designs for dry storage systems rely on large multi-assembly canisters, the most common of which are so-called “dual-purpose canisters” (DPCs). DPCs are certified for both storage and transportation, but are not designed or licensed for permanent disposal. The large capacity (greater number of spent fuel assemblies) of these canisters can lead to higher canister temperatures, which can delay transportation and/or complicate disposal. This current management practice, in which the utilities continue loading an ever-increasing inventory of larger DPCs, does not emphasize integration among storage, transportation, and disposal. This lack of integration does not cause safety issues, but it does lead to a suboptimal system that increases costs, complicates storage and transportation operations, and limits options for permanent disposal. This paper describes strategies for improving integration of management practices in the US across the entire back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. The complex interactions between storage, transportation, and disposal make a single optimal solution unlikely. However, efforts to integrate various phases of nuclear waste management can have the greatest impact if they begin promptly and continue to evolve throughout the remaining life of the current fuel cycle. A key factor that influences the path forward for integration of nuclear waste management practices is the identification of the timing and location for a repository. The most cost-effective path forward would be to open a repository by mid-century with the capability to directly dispose of DPCs without repackaging the spent fuel into disposalready canisters. Options that involve repackaging of spent fuel from DPCs into disposalready canisters or that delay the repository opening significantly beyond mid-century could add 10s of billions of dollars to the total system life cycle cost.
This is a progress report on thermal modeling for dual-purpose canister (DPCs) direct disposal that covers several available calculation methods and addresses creep and temperature-dependent properties in a salt repository. Three modeling approaches are demonstrated: A semi-analytical calculation method that uses linear solutions with superposition and imaging, to represent a central waste package in a larger array; A finite difference model of coupled thermal creep, implemented in FLAC2D; and An integrated finite difference thermal-hydrologic modeling approach for repositories in different generic host media, implemented in PFLOTRAN. These approaches are at different levels of maturity, and future work is expected to add refinements and establish the best applications for each.
The U.S. Department of Energy supports an R&D program for evaluating approaches to direct disposal of commercial spent fuel in dual-purpose canisters (DPCs). The major thrusts include alternative measures for treating the possibility of internal criticality events in DPC-based waste packages after thousands of years in a repository. These measures include: 1) injectable fillers, 2) analysis of the consequences of criticality events in a repository should they occur, and 3) options for modifying fuel assemblies or baskets in DPCs at the time they are loaded. This report presents a snapshot of progress in each of these areas drawing on deliverable reports generated during FY18 through FY20. Another aspect of the R&D program is to develop concepts of operations for repositories that would permanently dispose of DPC-based waste packages, considering different generic host media (not site-specific). The idea is to examine whether the disposal of large, heavy, heat-generating waste packages is technically feasible, and to identify the engineering challenges that would arise during implementation of the different disposal concepts. Descriptions of repository features are presented for repositories in salt media, argillite (clay/shale) media, crystalline (e.g., granitic) media, and unsaturated media (considering either alluvium or hard rock). Thermal management criteria for each concept are presented in terms of the maximum waste package thermal power at emplacement, when the repository could be opened, and the duration of repository emplacement operations. The overall message of this report is that direct disposal of commercial spent fuel is technically feasible in different types of geologic host media, but that thermal management and postclosure criticality impose different constraints on each concept. Engineering challenges are recognized and discussed. Treatment of postclosure criticality is identified as an important technical question that receives the majority of attention in the R&D program.
Developing and evaluating approaches for direct geologic disposal of commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) is a cross-cutting multi-disciplinary activity that is directly tied to the implementation of DPCs by the nuclear industry. The ultimate goal of the DPC direct disposal R&D program is to facilitate and maximize safe, cost-effective, licensed direct disposal. Independent Technical Review (ITR) is needed to maximize the impact of the R&D program on future implementation. The review will involve a team of experts representing the nuclear industry, repository sciences, and licensing. The team will be charged to review a set of representative technical reports and other information, and answer a set of questions that focus on R&D steering.
By 2030 about half of all spent nuclear fuel (SNF) arising from the current fleet of commercial power plants will be in dual-purpose canisters (DPCs), which are designed for storage and transportation but not for disposal. As an alternative to complete repackaging of the fuel for disposal, considerable cost savings and lower worker dose could be realized by directly disposing of this SNF in DPCs. The principal technical consideration is criticality control in a geologic repository, because the DPCs are large and depend on neutron absorbing basket components for criticality control. Neutron absorbing materials are generally aluminum-based, and under disposal conditions can degrade after a few hundred years contact with ground water. Simple modifications to the SNF assemblies or the DPC baskets could help to achieve direct disposal, and this is one of the approaches being studied to address the possibility of disposal criticality (SNL 2020a). Five fuel/basket modification concepts have been proposed (SNL 2020b) and a virtual workshop was conducted to solicit review and feedback on these concepts. The proposed solutions are: 1) zone loading of DPCs to limit reactivity, 2) replacing absorber plates with advanced neutron absorbing (ANA) material, 3) adding disposal control rods to pressurized water reactor (PWR) assemblies, 4) rechanneling boiling water reactor (BWR) assemblies with ANA material, and 5) basket insert plates (chevron inserts) made from ANA material. The presentations from the workshop are provided in this report, and the workshop discussions are summarized. This information includes prioritization of the proposed fuel/basket modification solutions, and prioritization of the associated model development, validation testing, and quality assurance activities. Information documented in this report will help to steer research and development efforts at Sandia National Laboratories, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Idaho National Laboratory that support the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology program
Disposal of large, heat-generating waste packages containing the equivalent of 21 pressurized water reactor (PWR) assemblies or more is among the disposal concepts under investigation for a future repository for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in the United States. Without a long (>200 years) surface storage period, disposal of 21-PWR or larger waste packages (especially if they contain high-burnup fuel) would result in in-drift and near-field temperatures considerably higher than considered in previous generic reference cases that assume either 4-PWR or 12-PWR waste packages (Jové Colón et al. 2014; Mariner et al. 2015; 2017). Sevougian et al. (2019c) identified high-temperature process understanding as a key research and development (R&D) area for the Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign. A two-day workshop in February 2020 brought together campaign scientists with expertise in geology, geochemistry, geomechanics, engineered barriers, waste forms, and corrosion processes to begin integrated development of a high-temperature reference case for disposal of SNF in a mined repository in a shale host rock. Building on the progress made in the workshop, the study team further explored the concepts and processes needed to form the basis for a high-temperature shale repository reference case. The results are described in this report and summarized..
Sandia National Laboratories has hired Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., the authors of the FLAC3D geomechanics software, to couple FLAC3D with TOUGH3, the porous media flow solver. The work is being done to enable a coupled mechanical-thermal-hydraulic analysis of a potential criticality event in a dual purpose cannister (DPC). The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Science & Technology is investigating the performance of DPCs for direct geological disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Post closure criticality control is an important aspect of this investigation. Over geological timescales, it is envisioned that the canister and canister overpack will develop fractures due to stress corrosion processes. A breach in the canister could allow groundwater to fill the canister. Fresh water is a neutron moderator; thus, if the canister internals and fuel assemblies have been sufficiently degraded, a criticality event could occur. Such an event would release enough energy to boil the water between the fuel rods and pressurize the cannister. This internal pressurization may cause the initial fractures in the canister and overpack to grow. It is important to understand the change in hydraulic transmissivity between the canister and surroundings for two reasons: first, because it may control the potential for and frequency of subsequent criticality events; second, because it will control the release of radionuclides from the canister. The motivation for this work is to better understand the potential for periodic criticality events, cannister damage, and release of radionuclides during a criticality event in a DPC.
Commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) is accumulating at 72 sites across the U.S., at the rate of about 2,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU) per year. There are currently more than 2,700 dualpurpose canisters (DPCs) loaded with SNF, which are designed for storage and transportation but not disposal. If current storage practices continue, about half the eventual total U.S. SNF inventory will be in about 5,500 dry storage systems by 2035, with the entire inventory stored in 10,000 or more by 2060. The quantity of SNF in DPCs is now much greater than that anticipated in the past, leading the DOE to investigate the technical feasibility of direct disposal of SNF in DPCs. Studies in 2013-2015 concluded that the main technical challenges for disposal of SNF in DPCs are thermal management, handling and emplacement of large, heavy waste packages, and postclosure criticality control (Hardin et al. 2015). Of these, postclosure criticality control is the most challenging, and the R&D needed for this aspect of DPC direct disposal is the primary focus of this report.