Publications

Struve, Kenneth W.; Savage, Mark E.; Stygar, William A.; Weed, John W.; Weinbrecht, Edward A.; Cuneo, M.E.; Bloomquist, Douglas D.; Davis, Jean-Paul D.; LeChien, Keith R.; Matzen, M.K.; McKee, George R.; McDaniel, Dillon H.

Abstract not provided.

Bloomquist, Douglas D.; McDaniel, Dillon H.; McKee, George R.; Donovan, Guy L.; Weed, John W.; Faturos, Thomas V.; Tabor, Debra A.; Jordan, Carla M.

Sandia's Z Refurbishment (ZR) Project formally began in February 2002 to increase the Z Accelerator's utilization by providing the capability to perform more shots, improve precision and pulse shape variability, and increase delivered current. A project update was provided at the 15th International Pulsed Power Conference in 2005. The Z facility was shut down in July 2006 for structural/infrastructure modifications and installation of new pulsed power systems. The refurbishment will conclude in 2007. This paper provides a status update of the project covering the past 2 years of activities.

Bloomquist, Douglas D.; McDaniel, Dillon H.; McKee, George R.; Donovan, Guy L.; Weed, John W.; Faturos, Thomas V.; Jordan, Carla M.; Weinbrecht, Edward A.

Abstract not provided.

McDaniel, Dillon H.; Struve, Kenneth W.; Weed, John W.; Weinbrecht, Edward A.; Woodworth, Joseph R.; Bliss, David E.; Bloomquist, Douglas D.; Harjes, Henry C.; Lehr, J.M.; Long, Finis W.; Maenchen, John E.; McKee, George R.; Savage, Mark E.

Abstract not provided.

Bloomquist, Douglas D.; McDaniel, Dillon H.; Weed, John W.; Faturos, Thomas V.; McKee, George R.; Tabor, Debra A.; Warner, Peggy J.

Sandia National Laboratories Z Refurbishment (ZR) Project formally began in August 2002 to increase the Z Accelerator's utilization by providing the capability to perform more shots, improve precision and pulse shape variability, increase delivered current, and accomplish the improvements with minimal disruption to Z's ongoing programs. A project overview was provided at the 14th International Pulsed Power Conference in 2003. This paper provides an update of the project including architectural changes over the past two years, timeframe for completion, and overall design and fabrication status.

Weinbrecht, Edward A.; Weinbrecht, Edward A.; McDaniel, Dillon H.; Bloomquist, Douglas D.

Abstract not provided.

Bloomquist, Douglas D.

In 1993, the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA, PL 103-62) was enacted. GPRA, which applies to all federal programs, has three components: strategic plans, annual performance plans, and metrics to show how well annual plans are being followed. As part of meeting the GRPA requirement in FY2002, a 15-member external review committee chaired by Dr. Alvin Trivelpiece (the Trivelpiece Committee) was convened by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) on May 7-9, 2002 to review Sandia National Laboratories' Pulsed Power Programs as a component of the Performance Appraisal Process negotiated with the National Nuclear Security Administration of the Department of Energy (NNSA/DOE). The scope of the review included activities in high energy density physics (HEDP), inertial confinement fusion (ICF), radiation/weapon physics, the petawatt laser initiative (PW) and fast ignition, equation-of-state studies, radiation effects science and lethality, x-ray radiography, ZR development, basic research and pulsed power technology research and development, as well as electromagnetics and work for others. In his charge to the Committee, Dr. Jeffrey P. Quintenz, Director of Pulsed Power Sciences (Org. 1600) asked that the evaluation and feedback be based on three criteria: (1) quality of technical activities in science, technology, and engineering, (2) programmatic performance, management, and planning, and (3) relevance to national needs and agency missions. In addition, the director posed specific programmatic questions. The accompanying report, produced as a SAND document, is the report of the Committee's finding.

Bloomquist, Douglas D.

In 1993, the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA, PL 103-62) was enacted. GPRA, which applies to all federal programs, has three components: strategic plans, annual performance plans, and metrics to show how well annual plans are being followed. As part of meeting the GRPA requirement in FY2000, a 14-member external peer review panel (the Garwin Committee) was convened on May 17-19, 2000 to review Sandia National Laboratories' Pulsed Power Programs as a component of the Performance Appraisal Process negotiated with the Department of Energy (DOE). The scope of the review included activities in inertial confinement fission (ICF), weapon physics, development of radiation sources for weapons effects simulation, x-ray radiography, basic research in high energy density physics (HEDP), and pulsed power technology research and development. In his charge to the committee, Jeffrey Quintenz, Director of Pulsed Power Sciences (1600) asked that the review be based on four criteria (1) quality of science, technology, and engineering, (2) programmatic performance, management, and planning, (3) relevance to national needs and agency missions, and (4) performance in the operation and construction of major research facilities. In addition, specific programmatic questions were posed by the director and by the DOE-Defense Programs (DP). The accompanying report, produced as a SAND document, is the report of the committee's findings.