Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers the opportunity to transform design, manufacturing, and qualification with its unique capabilities. AM is a disruptive technology, allowing the capability to simultaneously create part and material while tightly controlling and monitoring the manufacturing process at the voxel level, with the inherent flexibility and agility in printing layer-by-layer. AM enables the possibility of measuring critical material and part parameters during manufacturing, thus changing the way we collect data, assess performance, and accept or qualify parts. It provides an opportunity to shift from the current iterative design-build-test qualification paradigm using traditional manufacturing processes to design-by-predictivity where requirements are addressed concurrently and rapidly. The new qualification paradigm driven by AM provides the opportunity to predict performance probabilistically, to optimally control the manufacturing process, and to implement accelerated cycles of learning. Exploiting these capabilities to realize a new uncertainty quantification-driven qualification that is rapid, flexible, and practical is the focus of this paper.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Austenitic stainless steels are used extensively in hydrogen gas containment components due to their known resilience in hydrogen environments. Depending on the conditions, degradation can occur in austenitic stainless steels but typically the materials retain sufficient mechanical properties within such extreme environments. In many hydrogen containment applications, it is necessary or advantageous to join components through welding as it ensures minimal gas leakage, unlike mechanical fittings that can become leak paths that develop over time. Over the years many studies have focused on the mechanical behavior of austenitic stainless steels in hydrogen environments and determined their properties to be sufficient for most applications. However, significantly less data have been generated on austenitic stainless steel welds, which can exhibit more degradation than the base material. In this paper, we assess the trends observed in austenitic stainless steel welds tested in hydrogen. Experiments of welds including tensile and fracture toughness testing are assessed and comparisons to behavior of base metals are discussed.

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers the potential for increased design flexibility in the low volume production of complex engineering components for hydrogen service. However the suitability of AM materials for such extreme service environments remains to be evaluated. This work examines the effects of internal and external hydrogen on AM type 304L austenitic stainless steels fabricated via directed-energy deposition (DED) and powder bed fusion (PBF) processes. Under ambient test conditions, AM materials with minimal manufacturing defects exhibit excellent combinations of tensile strength, tensile ductility, and fatigue resistance. To probe the effects of extreme hydrogen environments on the AM materials, tensile and fatigue tests were performed after thermalprecharging in high pressure gaseous hydrogen (internal H) or in high pressure gaseous hydrogen (external H). Hydrogen appears to have a comparable influence on the AM 304L as in wrought materials, although the micromechanisms of tensile fracture and fatigue crack growth appear distinct. Specifically, microstructural characterization implicates the unique solidification microstructure of AM materials in the propagation of cracks under conditions of tensile fracture with hydrogen. These results highlight the need to establish comprehensive microstructure-property relationships for AM materials to ensure their suitability for use in extreme hydrogen environments.

Abstract not provided.

This SAND report fulfills the final report requirement for the Born Qualified Grand Challenge LDRD. Born Qualified was funded from FY16-FY18 with a total budget of ~$13M over the 3 years of funding. Overall 70+ staff, Post Docs, and students supported this project over its lifetime. The driver for Born Qualified was using Additive Manufacturing (AM) to change the qualification paradigm for low volume, high value, high consequence, complex parts that are common in high-risk industries such as ND, defense, energy, aerospace, and medical. AM offers the opportunity to transform design, manufacturing, and qualification with its unique capabilities. AM is a disruptive technology, allowing the capability to simultaneously create part and material while tightly controlling and monitoring the manufacturing process at the voxel level, with the inherent flexibility and agility in printing layer-by-layer. AM enables the possibility of measuring critical material and part parameters during manufacturing, thus changing the way we collect data, assess performance, and accept or qualify parts. It provides an opportunity to shift from the current iterative design-build-test qualification paradigm using traditional manufacturing processes to design-by-predictivity where requirements are addressed concurrently and rapidly. The new qualification paradigm driven by AM provides the opportunity to predict performance probabilistically, to optimally control the manufacturing process, and to implement accelerated cycles of learning. Exploiting these capabilities to realize a new uncertainty quantification-driven qualification that is rapid, flexible, and practical is the focus of this effort.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Additive manufacturing (AM) includes a diverse suite of innovative manufacturing processes for producing near-net shape metallic components, typically from powder or wire. Reported mechanical properties of materials produced by these processes varies significantly and can usually be correlated with the relative porosity in the materials. In this study, relatively simple test components were manufactured from type 304L austenitic stainless steel by powder bed fusion (PBF). The quality of the components depends on a host of manufacturing parameters as well as the characteristics of the feedstock. In this study, the focus is the bulk material response. Tensile properties are reported for PBF type 304L produced in similar build geometries on two different machines with independent operators. Additionally, the effect of hydrogen on the tensile properties of the AM materials is evaluated. The goal of this study is to provide a benchmark for tensile properties of PBF 304L material in the context of wrought type 304L, and to make a preliminary assessment of the effects of hydrogen on tensile properties.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.