Publications

Results 1–25 of 44
Skip to search filters

94ND10 Intergranular Phase Analysis and Fabrication

Bishop, Sean R.; Boro, Joseph R.; Jauregui, Luis J.; Price, Patrick M.; Peretti, Amanda S.; Lowry, Daniel R.; Kammler, Daniel K.

The composition and phase fraction of the intergranular phase of 94ND10 ceramic is determined and fabricated ex situ. The fraction of each phase is 85.96 vol% Al2O3 bulk phase, 9.46 vol% Mg-rich intergranular phase, 4.36 vol% Ca/Si-rich intergranular phase, and 0.22 vol% voids. The Ca/Si-rich phase consists of 0.628 at% Mg, 12.59 at% Si, 10.24 at% Ca, 17.23 at% Al, and balance O. The Mgrich phase consists of 14.17 at% Mg, 0.066 at% Si, 0.047 at% Ca, 28.69 at% Al, and balance O. XRD of the ex situ intergranular material made by mixed oxides consisting of the above phase and element fractions yielded 92 vol% MgAl2O4 phase and 8 vol% CaAl2Si2O8 phase. The formation of MgAl2O4 phase is consistent with prior XRD of 94ND10, while the CaAl2Si2O8 phase may exist in 94ND10 but at a concentration not readily detected with XRD. The MgAl2O4 and CaAl2Si2O8 phases determined from XRD are expected to have the elemental compositions for the Mg-rich and Ca/Si-rich phases above by cation substitutions (e.g., some Mg substituted for by Ca in the Mg-rich phase) and impurity phases not detectable with XRD.

More Details

Flexural strength of a conventionally processed and additively manufactured debased 94% alumina

International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology

Kammler, Daniel K.; Cillessen, Dale C.; Ford, Kurtis R.; Larkin, Elizabeth C.; Davidson, Will M.; Christopher, James M.; Gibson, Julie T.

Mechanical strength of a 94 wt% debased alumina was measured using ASTM-C1161 specimens fabricated via conventional and lithography-based ceramic manufacturing (LCM) methods. The effects of build orientation and a 1500°C wet hydrogen fire added to the LCM firing sequence on strength were evaluated. A Weibull fit to the conventional flexural specimen data yielded 20 and 356 MPa for the modulus and characteristic strength, respectively. Weibull fits of the data from the LCM specimens yielded moduli between 7.5 and 11.3 and characteristics strengths between 333 and 339 MPa. A Weibull fit to data from LCM specimens subjected to the wet hydrogen fire yielded 14.2 and 376 MPa for the modulus and characteristic strength, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals for all Weibull parameters are reported. Average Archimedes bulk densities of LCM and conventional specimens were 3.732 and 3.730 g/cm3, respectively. Process dependent differences in surface morphology were observed in scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of specimen surfaces. SEM images of LCM specimen cross-sections showed alumina grain texture dependent on build direction, but no evidence of porosity concentrated in planes between printed layers. Fracture surfaces of LCM and conventionally processed specimens revealed hackle lines and mirror regions indicative of fracture initiation at the sample surface rather than the interior.

More Details

Minimizing residual stress in brazed joints by optimizing the brazing thermal profile

ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)

Mann, Ben; Ford, Kurtis R.; Neilsen, Michael K.; Kammler, Daniel K.

Ceramic to metal brazing is a common bonding process usedin many advanced systems such as automotive engines, aircraftengines, and electronics. In this study, we use optimizationtechniques and finite element analysis utilizing viscoplastic andthermo-elastic material models to find an optimum thermalprofile for a Kovar® washer bonded to an alumina button that istypical of a tension pull test. Several active braze filler materialsare included in this work. Cooling rates, annealing times, aging,and thermal profile shapes are related to specific materialbehaviors. Viscoplastic material models are used to represent thecreep and plasticity behavior in the Kovar® and braze materialswhile a thermo-elastic material model is used on the alumina.The Kovar® is particularly interesting because it has a Curiepoint at 435°C that creates a nonlinearity in its thermal strain andstiffness profiles. This complex behavior incentivizes theoptimizer to maximize the stress above the Curie point with afast cooling rate and then favors slow cooling rates below theCurie point to anneal the material. It is assumed that if failureoccurs in these joints, it will occur in the ceramic material.Consequently, the maximum principle stress of the ceramic isminimized in the objective function. Specific details of the stressstate are considered and discussed.

More Details

Using additive manufacturing as a pathway to change the qualification paradigm

Solid Freeform Fabrication 2018: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2018

Roach, R.A.; Bishop, Joseph E.; Johnson, Kyle J.; Rodgers, Theron R.; Boyce, B.L.; Swiler, L.; van Bloemen Waanders, Bart G.; Chandross, M.; Kammler, Daniel K.; Balch, Dorian K.; Jared, B.; Martinez, Mario J.; Leathe, Nicholas L.; Ford, K.

Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers the opportunity to transform design, manufacturing, and qualification with its unique capabilities. AM is a disruptive technology, allowing the capability to simultaneously create part and material while tightly controlling and monitoring the manufacturing process at the voxel level, with the inherent flexibility and agility in printing layer-by-layer. AM enables the possibility of measuring critical material and part parameters during manufacturing, thus changing the way we collect data, assess performance, and accept or qualify parts. It provides an opportunity to shift from the current iterative design-build-test qualification paradigm using traditional manufacturing processes to design-by-predictivity where requirements are addressed concurrently and rapidly. The new qualification paradigm driven by AM provides the opportunity to predict performance probabilistically, to optimally control the manufacturing process, and to implement accelerated cycles of learning. Exploiting these capabilities to realize a new uncertainty quantification-driven qualification that is rapid, flexible, and practical is the focus of this paper.

More Details

Born Qualified Grand Challenge LDRD Final Report

Roach, R.A.; Argibay, Nicolas A.; Allen, Kyle M.; Balch, Dorian K.; Beghini, Lauren L.; Bishop, Joseph E.; Boyce, Brad B.; Brown, Judith A.; Burchard, Ross L.; Chandross, M.; Cook, Adam W.; DiAntonio, Christopher D.; Dressler, Amber D.; Forrest, Eric C.; Ford, Kurtis R.; Ivanoff, Thomas I.; Jared, Bradley H.; Johnson, Kyle J.; Kammler, Daniel K.; Koepke, Joshua R.; Kustas, Andrew K.; Lavin, Judith M.; Leathe, Nicholas L.; Lester, Brian T.; Madison, Jonathan D.; Mani, Seethambal S.; Martinez, Mario J.; Moser, Daniel M.; Rodgers, Theron R.; Seidl, Daniel T.; Brown-Shaklee, Harlan J.; Stanford, Joshua S.; Stender, Michael S.; Sugar, Joshua D.; Swiler, Laura P.; Taylor, Samantha T.; Trembacki, Bradley T.

This SAND report fulfills the final report requirement for the Born Qualified Grand Challenge LDRD. Born Qualified was funded from FY16-FY18 with a total budget of ~$13M over the 3 years of funding. Overall 70+ staff, Post Docs, and students supported this project over its lifetime. The driver for Born Qualified was using Additive Manufacturing (AM) to change the qualification paradigm for low volume, high value, high consequence, complex parts that are common in high-risk industries such as ND, defense, energy, aerospace, and medical. AM offers the opportunity to transform design, manufacturing, and qualification with its unique capabilities. AM is a disruptive technology, allowing the capability to simultaneously create part and material while tightly controlling and monitoring the manufacturing process at the voxel level, with the inherent flexibility and agility in printing layer-by-layer. AM enables the possibility of measuring critical material and part parameters during manufacturing, thus changing the way we collect data, assess performance, and accept or qualify parts. It provides an opportunity to shift from the current iterative design-build-test qualification paradigm using traditional manufacturing processes to design-by-predictivity where requirements are addressed concurrently and rapidly. The new qualification paradigm driven by AM provides the opportunity to predict performance probabilistically, to optimally control the manufacturing process, and to implement accelerated cycles of learning. Exploiting these capabilities to realize a new uncertainty quantification-driven qualification that is rapid, flexible, and practical is the focus of this effort.

More Details

Data Analysis for the Born Qualified Grand LDRD Project

Swiler, Laura P.; van Bloemen Waanders, Bart G.; Jared, Bradley H.; Koepke, Joshua R.; Whetten, Shaun R.; Madison, Jonathan D.; Ivanoff, Thomas I.; Jackson, Olivia D.; Cook, Adam W.; Brown-Shaklee, Harlan J.; Kammler, Daniel K.; Johnson, Kyle J.; Ford, Kurtis R.; Bishop, Joseph E.; Roach, R.A.

This report summarizes the data analysis activities that were performed under the Born Qualified Grand Challenge Project from 2016 - 2018. It is meant to document the characterization of additively manufactured parts and processe s for this project as well as demonstrate and identify further analyses and data science that could be done relating material processes to microstructure to properties to performance.

More Details

Changing the Engineering Design & Qualification Paradigm in Component Design & Manufacturing (Born Qualified)

Roach, R.A.; Bishop, Joseph E.; Jared, Bradley H.; Keicher, David M.; Cook, Adam W.; Whetten, Shaun R.; Forrest, Eric C.; Stanford, Joshua S.; Boyce, Brad B.; Johnson, Kyle J.; Rodgers, Theron R.; Ford, Kurtis R.; Martinez, Mario J.; Moser, Daniel M.; van Bloemen Waanders, Bart G.; Chandross, M.; Abdeljawad, Fadi F.; Allen, Kyle M.; Stender, Michael S.; Beghini, Lauren L.; Swiler, Laura P.; Lester, Brian T.; Argibay, Nicolas A.; Brown-Shaklee, Harlan J.; Kustas, Andrew K.; Sugar, Joshua D.; Kammler, Daniel K.; Wilson, Mark A.

Abstract not provided.

Results 1–25 of 44
Results 1–25 of 44