Ducted fuel injection (DFI) is a novel combustion strategy that has been shown to significantly attenuate soot formation in diesel engines. While previous studies have used optical diagnostics and optical filter smoke number methods to show that DFI reduces in-cylinder soot formation and engine-out soot emissions, respectively, this is the first study to measure solid particle number (PN) emissions in addition to particle mass (PM). Furthermore, this study quantitatively evaluates the use of transient particle instruments for measuring particles from skip-fired operation in an optical single cylinder research engine (SCRE). Engine-out PN was measured using an engine exhaust particle sizer following a catalytic stripper, and PM was measured using a photoacoustic analyzer. The study improves on earlier preliminary emissions studies by clearly showing that DFI reduces overall PM by 76%–79% and PN for particles larger than 23 nm by 77% relative to conventional diesel combustion at a 1200-rpm, 13.3-bar gross indicated mean effective pressure operating condition. The degree of engine-out PM reduction with DFI was similar across both particulate measurement instruments used in the work. Through the use of bimodal distribution fitting, DFI was also shown to reduce the geometric mean diameter of accumulation mode particles by 26%, similar to the effects of increased injection pressure in conventional diesel combustion systems. This work clearly shows the significant solid particulate matter reductions enabled by DFI while also demonstrating that engine-out PN can be accurately measured from an optical SCRE operating in a skip-fired mode. Based on these results, it is believed that DFI has the potential to enable fuel savings when implemented in multi-cylinder engines, both by lowering the required frequency of active diesel particulate filter regeneration, and by reducing the backpressure imposed by exhaust filtration systems.
Continued creation of harmful emissions such as NOx and soot from compression-ignition engines utilizing mixing-controlled combustion systems (i.e., diesel engines) remains a problem and is the subject of on-going research. The inherently high efficiency, relatively low cost, and numerous other desirable attributes of such engines, coupled with a widely supported infrastructure, motivates their continued advancement. Recently, a scientifically distinct and mechanically simple technology called ducted fuel injection (DFI) has shown a robust ability to allow such engines to operate with simultaneously low engine-out soot and NOx emissions when it is employed with simulated exhaust-gas recirculation. To better understand the property ranges of sustainable, oxygenated-fuel blending stocks that will most improve engine performance, two oxygenated blendstocks were separately blended with a commercial diesel base fuel and tested within a heavy-duty diesel optical engine equipped with a four-duct DFI configuration. Conventional and crank-angle-resolved optical diagnostics were used to elucidate the effects of fuel ignition quality, oxygenate molecular structure, and overall oxygen content on engine performance.
This paper describes results from an optical-engine investigation of oxygenated fuel effects on ducted fuel injection (DFI) relative to conventional diesel combustion (CDC). Three fuels were tested: a baseline, non-oxygenated No. 2 emissions certification diesel (denoted CFB), and two blends containing potential renewable oxygenates. The first oxygenated blend contained 25 vol% methyl decanoate in CFB (denoted MD25), and the second contained 25 vol% tri-propylene glycol mono-methyl ether in CFB (denoted T25). Whereas DFI and fuel oxygenation primarily curtail soot emissions, intake-oxygen mole fractions of 21% and 16% were employed to explore the potential additional beneficial impact of dilution on engine-out emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx). It was found that DFI with an oxygenated fuel can attenuate soot incandescence by ~100X (~10X from DFI and an additional ~10X from fuel oxygenation) relative to CDC with conventional diesel fuel, regardless of dilution level and without large effects on other emissions or efficiency. This breaks the soot/NOx trade-off with dilution, enabling simultaneous reductions in both soot and NOx emissions, even with conventional diesel fuel. Significant cyclic variability in soot incandescence for both CDC and DFI suggests that additional improvements in engine-out soot emissions may be possible via improved control of in-cylinder mixture formation and evolution.
Diesel engines are an important technology for transportation of both people and goods. However, historically they have suffered a significant downside of high soot and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. Recently, ducted fuel injection (DFI) has been demonstrated to attenuate soot formation in compression-ignition engines and combustion vessels by 50% to 100%. This allows for diesel engines to be run at low-NOx emissions that would have otherwise produced significantly more soot due to the soot/NOx tradeoff. Currently the root causes of this soot attenuation are not well understood. To be able to better optimize DFI for use across a variety of engines and conditions, it is important to understand clearly how it works. This study expands on the current understanding of DFI by using numerical modeling under nonreacting conditions to provide insights about the roles of entrainment and mixing that would have been much more challenging to obtain experimentally. This study found that DFI enhances charge gas entrainment upstream of the duct and blocks entrainment inside of the duct. Mixing is enhanced by the duct, which results in lower peak equivalence ratios at the exit of the duct.
Ducted fuel injection (DFI) has been shown to attenuate engine-out soot emissions from diesel engines. The concept is to inject fuel through a small tube within the combustion chamber to enable lower equivalence ratios at the autoignition zone, relative to conventional diesel combustion. Previous experiments have demonstrated that DFI enables significant soot attenuation relative to conventional diesel combustion for a small set of operating conditions at relatively low engine loads. This is the first study to compare DFI to conventional diesel combustion over a wide range of operating conditions and at higher loads (up to 8.5 bar gross indicated mean effective pressure) with a four-orifice fuel injector. This study compares DFI to conventional diesel combustion through sweeps of intake-oxygen mole fraction (XO2), injection duration, intake pressure, start of combustion (SOC) timing, fuel-injection pressure, and intake temperature. DFI is shown to curtail engine-out soot emissions at all tested conditions. Under certain conditions, DFI can attenuate engine-out soot by over a factor of 100. In addition to producing significantly lower engine-out soot emissions, DFI enables the engine to be operated at low-NOx conditions that are not feasible with conventional diesel combustion due to high soot emissions.
Ducted fuel injection (DFI) is a technique to attenuate soot formation in compression ignition engines relative to conventional diesel combustion (CDC). The concept is to inject fuel through a small tube inside the combustion chamber to reduce equivalence ratios in the autoignition zone relative to CDC. DFI has been studied at loads as high as 8.5 bar gross indicated mean effective pressure (IMEPg) and as low as 2.5 bar IMEPg using a four-orifice fuel injector. Across previous studies, DFI has been shown to attenuate soot emissions, increase NOx emissions (at constant charge dilution), and slightly decrease fuel conversion efficiencies for most tested points. This study expands on the previous work by testing 1.1 bar IMEPg (low-load/idle) conditions and 10 bar IMEPg (higher-load) conditions with the same four-orifice fuel injector, as well as examining potential causes of the degradations in NOx emissions and fuel conversion efficiencies. DFI and CDC are directly compared at each operating point in the study. At the low-load condition, the intake charge dilution was swept to elucidate the soot and NOx performance of DFI. The low-load range is important because it is the target of impending, more-stringent emissions regulations, and DFI is shown to be a potentially effective approach for helping to meet these regulations. The results also indicate that DFI likely has slightly decreased fuel conversion efficiencies relative to CDC. The increase in NOx emissions with DFI is likely due to longer charge gas residence times at higher temperatures, which arise from shorter combustion durations and advanced combustion phasing relative to CDC.
Designers of direct-injection compression-ignition engines use a variety of strategies to improve the fuel/charge-gas mixture within the combustion chamber for increased efficiency and reduced pollutant emissions. Strategies include the use of high fuel-injection pressures, multiple injections, small injector orifices, flow swirl, long-ignition-delay conditions, and oxygenated fuels. This is the first journal publication on a new mixing-enhancement strategy for emissions reduction: ducted fuel injection. The concept involves injecting fuel along the axis of a small cylindrical duct within the combustion chamber, to enhance the mixture in the autoignition zone relative to a conventional free-spray configuration (i.e., a fuel spray that is not surrounded by a duct). The results described herein, from initial proof-of-concept experiments conducted in a constant-volume combustion vessel, show dramatically lower soot incandescence from ducted fuel injection than from free sprays over a range of charge-gas conditions that are representative of those in modern direct-injection compression-ignition engines.
Ducted fuel injection (DFI) is a technique for lowering emissions (primarily soot emissions) from high-efficiency compression-ignition (CI) engines, as well as other devices employing the direct injection of fuel into a combustion chamber. The DFI concept was inspired by the cleaner burn that is created by premixing fuel and air in the tube of a Bunsen burner, which was created to reduce soot production common in burners of the period as stated by Kohn [American Chemical Society, 1949].