This report documents the results and conclusions of a recent project to understand the technoeconomics of utility-scale, particle-based concentrating solar power (CSP) facilities leveraging unique operational strategies. This project included two primary objectives. The first project objective was to build confidence in the modeling approaches applied to falling particle receivers (FPRs) including the effect s of wind. The second project objective was to create the necessary modeling capability to adequately predict and maximize the annual performance of utility-scale, particle-based CSP plants under anticipated conditions with and without active heliostat control. Results of an extensive model validation study provided the strongest evidence to date for the modeling strategies typically applied to FPRs, albeit at smaller receiver scales. This modeling strategy was then applied in a parametric study of candidate utility-scale FPRs, including both free-falling and multistage FPR concepts, to develop reduced order models for predicting the receiver thermal efficiency under anticipated environmental and operating conditions. Multistage FPRs were found to significantly improve receiver performance at utility-scales. These reduced order models were then leveraged in a sophisticated technoeconomic analysis to optimize utility-scale , particle-based CSP plants considering the potential of active heliostat control. In summary, active heliostat control did not show significant performance benefits to future utility-scale CSP systems though some benefit may still be realized in FPR designs with wide acceptance angles and/or with lower concentration ratios. Using the latest FPR technologies available, the levelized-cost of electricity was quantified for particle-based CSP facilities with nominal powers ranging from 5 MWe up to 100 MWe with many viable designs having costs < 0.06 $/kWh and local minimums occurring between ~25–35 MWe.
The U.S. Department of Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office initiated the Generation 3 Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) program to achieve higher operating temperatures (>700 °C) to enable next-generation CSP high-temperature power cycles such as the supercritical CO2 (sCO2) Brayton Cycle. Three teams were selected to pursue high-temperature gas, liquid, and solid pathways for the heat-transfer media. Phases 1 and 2, which lasted from 2018 – 2020, consisted of design, modeling, and testing activities to further de-risk each of the technologies and develop a design for construction, commissioning, and operation of a pilot-scale facility in Phase 3 (2021 – 2024). This report summarizes the activities in Phases 1 and 2 for the solid-particle pathway led by Sandia National Laboratories. In Phases 1 and 2, Sandia successfully de-risked key elements of the proposed Gen 3 Particle Pilot Plant (G3P3) by improving the design, operation, and performance of key particle component technologies including the receiver, storage bins, particle-to-sCO2 heat exchanger, particle lift, and data acquisition and controls. Modeling and testing of critical components have led to optimized designs that meet desired performance metrics. Detailed drawings, piping and instrumentation diagrams, and process flow diagrams were generated for the integrated system, and structural analyses of the assembled tower structure were performed to demonstrate compliance with relevant codes and standards. Instrumentation and control systems of key subsystems were also demonstrated. Together with Bridgers & Paxton, Bohannan Huston, and Sandia Facilities, we have completed a 100% G3P3 tower design package with stamped engineering drawings suitable for construction bid in Phase 3.
This paper provides an overview of a next-generation particle-based concentrating solar power (CSP) system. The Gen 3 Particle Pilot Plant (G3P3) will heat particles to over 700 °C for use in high-temperature air or supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles with 6 hours of storage. The particles, which are inert, non-corrosive, durable, and inexpensive, are used as both the heat-transfer and storage media. Details of the operation, requirements, and design basis for the G3P3 system are presented, including a description of expected operational states and major components. Operational states include start-up, transients, steady-state operation, off-design conditions, and idling. The key components include the particle receiver, storage bins, heat exchanger, lift, and tower structure subsystems. Design bases and innovative features of each component are presented that will aid in achieving the desired cost and performance metrics.
A strategy to optimize the thermal efficiency of falling particle receivers (FPRs) in concentrating solar power applications is described in this paper. FPRs are a critical component of a falling particle system, and receiver designs with high thermal efficiencies (~90%) for particle outlet temperatures > 700°C have been targeted for next generation systems. Advective losses are one of the most significant loss mechanisms for FPRs. Hence, this optimization aims to find receiver geometries that passively minimize these losses. The optimization strategy consists of a series of simulations varying different geometric parameters on a conceptual receiver design for the Generation 3 Particle Pilot Plant (G3P3) project using simplified CFD models to model the flow. A linear polynomial surrogate model was fit to the resulting data set, and a global optimization routine was then executed on the surrogate to reveal an optimized receiver geometry that minimized advective losses. This optimized receiver geometry was then evaluated with more rigorous CFD models, revealing a thermal efficiency of 86.9% for an average particle temperature increase of 193.6°C and advective losses less than 3.5% of the total incident thermal power in quiescent conditions.
Two active airflow control methods are investigated to mitigate advective and particle losses from the open aperture of a falling particle receiver. Advective losses can be reduced via active airflow methods. However, in the case of once-through suction, energy lost as enthalpy of hot air due to active airflow needs to be minimized so that thermal efficiency can be maximized. In the case of forced air injection, a properly configured aerowindow can reduce advective losses substantially for calm conditions. Although some improvement is offered in windy conditions, an aerowindow in the presence of winds does not show an ability to mitigate advective losses to values achievable by an aerowindow in the absence of wind. The two active airflow methods considered in this paper both show potential for efficiency improvement, but the improvement many not be justified given the added complexity and cost of implementing an active airflow system. While active airflow methods are tractable for a 1 MWth cavity receiver with a 1 m square aperture, the scalability of these active airflow methods is questionable when considering commercial scale receivers with 10–20 m square apertures or larger.