Publications

Large diameter deep borehole disposal concept for HLW glass

Rigali, Mark J.; Hardin, Ernest H.; Stein, Emily S.; Su, Jiann-Cherng S.

This paper considers concepts for disposal of canistered high-level (radioactive) waste (HLW) in large diameter deep boreholes. Vitrified HLW pour canisters are limited in diameter to promote glass cooling, and constitute a large potential application for borehole disposal where diameter is constrained. The objective for disposal would be waste packages with diameter of 22 to 29 inches, which could encompass all existing and projected HLW glass inventory in the United States. Deep, large diameter boreholes of the sizes needed have been successfully drilled, and we identify other potentially effective designs. The depth of disposal boreholes would be site-specific, and need not be as deep as the 5 km being investigated in the Deep Borehole Field Test. For example, a 0.91 m (36 inch) diameter borehole drilled to 3 km could be used for disposal from 2.5 to 3 km (8, 200 to 9, 840 ft). The engineering feasibility of such boreholes is greater today than was concluded by earlier studies done in Sweden and the United States. Moreover, the disposal concept and generic safety case have evolved to a point where borehole construction need not be as elaborate as previously assumed. Each borehole in the example could accommodate approximately 100 waste packages containing canisters of vitrified HLW. Emplacement of the packages would be through a 32-inch (0.81 m) guidance casing, installed in two sections to reduce hoisting loads, and forming a continuous pathway from the surface to total depth. Above the disposal zone would be a nominal 1 km (3, 280-ft) seal interval, similar to previously published concepts. Following those concept studies, the seal system would consist of alternating lifts of swelling clay, backfill and cement. Above the seal zone the borehole would be plugged with cement in the conventional manner for oil-and-gas wells. The function of seals in deep borehole disposal is to maintain the pre-drilling hydrologic regime in the crystalline basement, where groundwater is increasingly saline, stagnant, and ancient. Seals would resist fluid movement and radionuclide transport during an early period of waste heating, but after cooling little fluid movement is expected. Thus, the function of seals could be less important with HLW that has low heat output, and sealing requirements could be limited. The safety case for deep borehole disposal relies on the prevalence of groundwater that is increasingly saline with depth, stagnant, and ancient, in crystalline basement rock that has low bulk permeability and is isolated from surface processes. The minimum depth for disposal depends on sitespecific factors, and may be less than the 2.5 km example. Rough-order-of-magnitude cost estimates show that deep borehole disposal of HLW would be cost-competitive with the lowest cost mine repository options. Thinner overburden, and shallower development of conditions favorable to waste isolation, could make drilling of large-diameter disposal boreholes even more cost effective. The dimensions of the disposal zone and seal zone would be site specific, and would be adjusted to ensure that both are situated in unaltered crystalline basement rock.