Publications
Effective Permeability of a Nuclear Fuel Assembly
Gelbard, Fred G.; Keesling, Dallin J.
This report aids in the development of models to perform characterization studies of aerosol dispersal and deposition within a spent fuel cask system. Due to the complex geometry in a spent-fuel canister, direct simulation of buoyancy-driven flow through the fuel assemblies to model aerosol deposition within the fuel canister is computationally expensive. Identification of an effective permeability as given in this work for a nuclear fuel assembly greatly simplifies the requirements for thermal hydraulic computations. The results of computations performed using OpenFOAM® to solve the Navier-Stokes Equations for laminar flow are used to determine an effective permeability by applying Darcy's Law. The computations are validated against an analytical solution for the special case of an infinite array of pins for which the numerical and analytical solutions have excellent agreement. The effective permeability of a 1717 PWR nuclear fuel assembly in a basket without spacer grids is numerically determined to be 1.85010 -6 m 2 for the range of fluid viscosities and pressure drops expected in a spent fuel storage canister. However, the flow is not uniform on the scale of multiple pins. Instead, significantly higher velocities are attained in the space between the assembly and the basket walls compared to the flow between the fuel pins within the assembly. Comparison with an analytical solution for fully developed flow through an infinite array of pins shows that the larger spacing near the basket walls results in about a 20% larger permeability compared to the analytical solution which does not include the enhanced flow in the space between the assembly and basket wall, or entrance and exit effects. A preliminary assessment of turbulence effects shows that with a k-epsilon model, significantly higher flow velocities are attained between the fuel pins within the assembly compared to the flow velocity in the space between the assembly and the basket walls. This is the opposite of what is determined for laminar flow.